2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Architecture, design, implementation

Amnon H. Eden, Rick Kazman

Open publisher page 73 citations

Abstract

The terms architecture, design, and implementation are typically used informally in partitioning software specifi-cations into three coarse strata of abstraction. Yet these strata are not well-defined in either research or practice, causing miscommunication and needless debate. To remedy this problem we formalize the Intension and the Locality criteria, which imply that the distinction be-tween architecture, design, and implementation is quali-tative and not merely quantitative. We demonstrate that architectural styles are intensional and non-local; that design patterns are intensional and local; and that imple-mentations are extensional and local. If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is. — J. H. von Neumann 1.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The terms architecture, design, and implementation are typically used informally in partitioning software specifi-cations into three coarse strata of abstraction. Yet these strata are not well-defined in either research or practice, causing miscommunication and needless debate. To remedy this problem we formalize the Intension and the Locality criteria, which imply that the distinction be-tween architecture, design, and implementation is quali-tative and not merely quantitative. We demonstrate that architectural styles are intensional and non-local; that design patterns are intensional and local; and that imple-mentations are extensional and local. If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is. — J. H. von Neumann 1.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 73 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The terms architecture, design, and implementation are typically used informally in partitioning software specifi-cations into three coarse strata of abstraction. Yet these strata are not well-defined in either research or practice, causing miscommunication and needless debate. To remedy this problem we formalize the Intension and the Locality criteria, which imply that the distinction be-tween architecture, design, and implementation is quali-tative and not merely quantitative. We demonstrate that architectural styles are intensional and non-local; that design patterns are intensional and local; and that imple-mentations are extensional and local. If people do not believe that mathematics is simple, it is only because they do not realize how complicated life is. — J. H. von Neumann 1.

Key concepts: Locality, Computer science, Intension, Architecture, Implementation, Abstraction, Software engineering, Software architecture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Architecture, design, implementation — Research Paper | ScholarLens