1978•Canadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyRequires access

The effects of vasodilators in the perfused hind limbs of spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats

Guy Deragon, Domenico C. Regoli, Francis Rioux

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The vascular effects of isoproterenol and nitroprusside were evaluated in the perfused hind limbs of age-matched normotensive Wistar (NW) and spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. The vasodilating effects of these two compounds were assessed in the presence of concentrations of noradrenaline sufficient to raise the basal perfusion pressure to 85--110 mmHg. The sensitivity of the hind limb vessels of SH rats to the vasodilating action of isoproterenol (2.4 x 10-6--1.0 x 10-4 M) was slightly greater than that of the hind limb vessels of NW rats. On the other hand, the sensitivity to the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside (1.7 x 10-7--3.3 x 10-5 M) was similar in the hind limb vessels of both groups of rats. Propranolol (7.6 x 10-6 M) inhibited to a similar extent the isoproterenol-induced dilation of NW or SH hind limb vessels, but did not modify the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside in these preparations, thus suggesting that the vasodilating action of isoproterenol was due to the stimulation of vascular beta-adrenergic receptors. These results do not support the hypothesis suggesting the existence of a deficient vascular relaxation in hypertensive rats.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The vascular effects of isoproterenol and nitroprusside were evaluated in the perfused hind limbs of age-matched normotensive Wistar (NW) and spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. The vasodilating effects of these two compounds were assessed in the presence of concentrations of noradrenaline sufficient to raise the basal perfusion pressure to 85--110 mmHg. The sensitivity of the hind limb vessels of SH rats to the vasodilating action of isoproterenol (2.4 x 10-6--1.0 x 10-4 M) was slightly greater than that of the hind limb vessels of NW rats. On the other hand, the sensitivity to the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside (1.7 x 10-7--3.3 x 10-5 M) was similar in the hind limb vessels of both groups of rats. Propranolol (7.6 x 10-6 M) inhibited to a similar extent the isoproterenol-induced dilation of NW or SH hind limb vessels, but did not modify the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside in these preparations, thus suggesting that the vasodilating action of isoproterenol was due to the stimulation of vascular beta-adrenergic receptors. These results do not support the hypothesis suggesting the existence of a deficient vascular relaxation in hypertensive rats.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The vascular effects of isoproterenol and nitroprusside were evaluated in the perfused hind limbs of age-matched normotensive Wistar (NW) and spontaneously hypertensive (SH) rats. The vasodilating effects of these two compounds were assessed in the presence of concentrations of noradrenaline sufficient to raise the basal perfusion pressure to 85--110 mmHg. The sensitivity of the hind limb vessels of SH rats to the vasodilating action of isoproterenol (2.4 x 10-6--1.0 x 10-4 M) was slightly greater than that of the hind limb vessels of NW rats. On the other hand, the sensitivity to the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside (1.7 x 10-7--3.3 x 10-5 M) was similar in the hind limb vessels of both groups of rats. Propranolol (7.6 x 10-6 M) inhibited to a similar extent the isoproterenol-induced dilation of NW or SH hind limb vessels, but did not modify the vasodilating effect of nitroprusside in these preparations, thus suggesting that the vasodilating action of isoproterenol was due to the stimulation of vascular beta-adrenergic receptors. These results do not support the hypothesis suggesting the existence of a deficient vascular relaxation in hypertensive rats.

Key concepts: Hindlimb, Vasodilation, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Propranolol, Perfusion, Sodium nitroprusside, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effects of vasodilators in the perfused hind limbs of spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive rats — Research Paper | ScholarLens