1996Journal of Geotechnical EngineeringRequires access

Influence of Hammer Type on SPT Results

Elliott E. Drumright, Charles W. Pfingsten, Robert G. Lukas

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The case of a relatively uniform sand site in Chicago is presented. Standard penetration test (SPT) values from samples driven using a drilling rig equipped with an automatic hammer were consistently lower than those from samples driven using a safety hammer. This is due to the higher efficiency of the automatic hammer, which results in greater energy delivered per blow. When averaged at each depth, the results indicated that SPT values using an automatic sampling hammer were approximately 75% of those recorded using the older-style safety hammer. The trend was consistent throughout the sand profile. This agrees with previously published relationships that indicate SPT results using automatic hammers can be expected to be approximately two-thirds of those recorded using safety hammers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The case of a relatively uniform sand site in Chicago is presented. Standard penetration test (SPT) values from samples driven using a drilling rig equipped with an automatic hammer were consistently lower than those from samples driven using a safety hammer. This is due to the higher efficiency of the automatic hammer, which results in greater energy delivered per blow. When averaged at each depth, the results indicated that SPT values using an automatic sampling hammer were approximately 75% of those recorded using the older-style safety hammer. The trend was consistent throughout the sand profile. This agrees with previously published relationships that indicate SPT results using automatic hammers can be expected to be approximately two-thirds of those recorded using safety hammers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The case of a relatively uniform sand site in Chicago is presented. Standard penetration test (SPT) values from samples driven using a drilling rig equipped with an automatic hammer were consistently lower than those from samples driven using a safety hammer. This is due to the higher efficiency of the automatic hammer, which results in greater energy delivered per blow. When averaged at each depth, the results indicated that SPT values using an automatic sampling hammer were approximately 75% of those recorded using the older-style safety hammer. The trend was consistent throughout the sand profile. This agrees with previously published relationships that indicate SPT results using automatic hammers can be expected to be approximately two-thirds of those recorded using safety hammers.

Key concepts: Hammer, Standard penetration test, Geotechnical engineering, Penetration test, Drilling, Impact energy, Penetration (warfare), Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Hammer Type on SPT Results — Research Paper | ScholarLens