2006International Journal of Food Science & TechnologyRequires access

Measurement and manipulation of aroma delivery allows control of perceived fruit flavour in low‐ and regular‐fat milks

Z.A. Shojaei, Robert Linforth, Joanne Hort, Tracey Hollowood, Andrew J. Taylor

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Summary To investigate the relationship between aroma delivery and perception, low‐fat (LF) (0.1 g per 100 mL) and regular‐fat (RF) (3.6 g per 100 mL) milk samples were prepared with the same amount of ethyl hexanoate. Sensory analysis was carried out using around ninety panellists (four replicates each) and simultaneous in vivo aroma delivery was measured for every sample. Panellists rated the fruity flavour intensity higher in LF samples using a paired comparison method (P < 0.0001, one‐tailed test). In vivo delivery was expressed as the ratio between the maximum breath concentrations (Imax), measured in the LF and RF samples (i.e. Imax LF milk/Imax RF milk), to remove person‐to‐person variation. The sensory results were in accordance with differences in aroma delivery, with LF samples delivering nearly twice as much ethyl hexanoate as RF samples. Aroma content in LF samples was adjusted so that aroma delivery in vivo was the same for both LF and RF samples. In this case, panellists could not differentiate the samples, showing a good correlation between aroma delivery and perception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary To investigate the relationship between aroma delivery and perception, low‐fat (LF) (0.1 g per 100 mL) and regular‐fat (RF) (3.6 g per 100 mL) milk samples were prepared with the same amount of ethyl hexanoate. Sensory analysis was carried out using around ninety panellists (four replicates each) and simultaneous in vivo aroma delivery was measured for every sample. Panellists rated the fruity flavour intensity higher in LF samples using a paired comparison method (P < 0.0001, one‐tailed test). In vivo delivery was expressed as the ratio between the maximum breath concentrations (Imax), measured in the LF and RF samples (i.e. Imax LF milk/Imax RF milk), to remove person‐to‐person variation. The sensory results were in accordance with differences in aroma delivery, with LF samples delivering nearly twice as much ethyl hexanoate as RF samples. Aroma content in LF samples was adjusted so that aroma delivery in vivo was the same for both LF and RF samples. In this case, panellists could not differentiate the samples, showing a good correlation between aroma delivery and perception.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary To investigate the relationship between aroma delivery and perception, low‐fat (LF) (0.1 g per 100 mL) and regular‐fat (RF) (3.6 g per 100 mL) milk samples were prepared with the same amount of ethyl hexanoate. Sensory analysis was carried out using around ninety panellists (four replicates each) and simultaneous in vivo aroma delivery was measured for every sample. Panellists rated the fruity flavour intensity higher in LF samples using a paired comparison method (P < 0.0001, one‐tailed test). In vivo delivery was expressed as the ratio between the maximum breath concentrations (Imax), measured in the LF and RF samples (i.e. Imax LF milk/Imax RF milk), to remove person‐to‐person variation. The sensory results were in accordance with differences in aroma delivery, with LF samples delivering nearly twice as much ethyl hexanoate as RF samples. Aroma content in LF samples was adjusted so that aroma delivery in vivo was the same for both LF and RF samples. In this case, panellists could not differentiate the samples, showing a good correlation between aroma delivery and perception.

Key concepts: Aroma, Ethyl hexanoate, Flavour, Food science, Aroma compound, Chemistry, Control sample, In vivo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measurement and manipulation of aroma delivery allows control of perceived fruit flavour in low‐ and regular‐fat milks — Research Paper | ScholarLens