1960•New Zealand Journal of Geology and GeophysicsRequires access

Hutt Valley fault scarps

C. A. Cotton

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Summary It is improbable that the sinuosity ot the Wellington Fault scarp has been notably increased by localised back.wearing, North‐east of the Wakatikei River the valiey‐side scarp of the Hutt Valley is half a mile out of alignment with the Wellington Fault and it is possible that its position is determined by a splinter or en échelon fault, The long straight segment of the valley side south‐west of the Wakatikei confluence has not necessarily been cut far back by the Hutt River, which more probably has merely retouched the youthful form of a fault scarp, perhaps removing soliflual debris that threatened to smother it, The view that the valley‐side scarp is a young fault scarp is supported bv the asymmetric form of the valley. Comparative immunity of the right bank of the Hutt River from attack by lateral river corrasion for some distance below the Akatarawa confluence may have been due to fan‐building by the Akalarawa River.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary It is improbable that the sinuosity ot the Wellington Fault scarp has been notably increased by localised back.wearing, North‐east of the Wakatikei River the valiey‐side scarp of the Hutt Valley is half a mile out of alignment with the Wellington Fault and it is possible that its position is determined by a splinter or en échelon fault, The long straight segment of the valley side south‐west of the Wakatikei confluence has not necessarily been cut far back by the Hutt River, which more probably has merely retouched the youthful form of a fault scarp, perhaps removing soliflual debris that threatened to smother it, The view that the valley‐side scarp is a young fault scarp is supported bv the asymmetric form of the valley. Comparative immunity of the right bank of the Hutt River from attack by lateral river corrasion for some distance below the Akatarawa confluence may have been due to fan‐building by the Akalarawa River.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary It is improbable that the sinuosity ot the Wellington Fault scarp has been notably increased by localised back.wearing, North‐east of the Wakatikei River the valiey‐side scarp of the Hutt Valley is half a mile out of alignment with the Wellington Fault and it is possible that its position is determined by a splinter or en échelon fault, The long straight segment of the valley side south‐west of the Wakatikei confluence has not necessarily been cut far back by the Hutt River, which more probably has merely retouched the youthful form of a fault scarp, perhaps removing soliflual debris that threatened to smother it, The view that the valley‐side scarp is a young fault scarp is supported bv the asymmetric form of the valley. Comparative immunity of the right bank of the Hutt River from attack by lateral river corrasion for some distance below the Akatarawa confluence may have been due to fan‐building by the Akalarawa River.

Key concepts: Fault scarp, Sinuosity, Geology, Fault (geology), Debris, Seismology, Geomorphology, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Hutt Valley fault scarps — Research Paper | ScholarLens