1992Diseases of the Colon & RectumRequires access

Internal rectal intussusception

John Christiansen, Binbin Zhu, Ole Ø. Rasmussen, Michael Sørensen

Open publisher page 87 citations

Abstract

Twenty-four patients with obstructed defecation due to rectal intussusception diagnosed by defecography were treated with rectopexy either by the Wells technique (9 patients) or by Orr's operation (15 patients). After follow-up from one to eight years, defecography demonstrated disappearance of the intussusception in 22 patients. None of the patients were completely relieved of their symptoms. Nine (41 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 21-64) were improved and 13 were unchanged (59 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 36-79), with no difference between the two procedures. One patient with solitary rectal ulcer was improved, and the ulcer disappeared. Four patients with moderate preoperative incontinence became continent postoperatively, but obstructed defecation was only improved in two of these patients. It is concluded that rectal intussusception is probably a secondary phenomenon in patients with obstructed defecation and that a conservative attitude toward surgery should be adopted.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Twenty-four patients with obstructed defecation due to rectal intussusception diagnosed by defecography were treated with rectopexy either by the Wells technique (9 patients) or by Orr's operation (15 patients). After follow-up from one to eight years, defecography demonstrated disappearance of the intussusception in 22 patients. None of the patients were completely relieved of their symptoms. Nine (41 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 21-64) were improved and 13 were unchanged (59 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 36-79), with no difference between the two procedures. One patient with solitary rectal ulcer was improved, and the ulcer disappeared. Four patients with moderate preoperative incontinence became continent postoperatively, but obstructed defecation was only improved in two of these patients. It is concluded that rectal intussusception is probably a secondary phenomenon in patients with obstructed defecation and that a conservative attitude toward surgery should be adopted.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 87 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Twenty-four patients with obstructed defecation due to rectal intussusception diagnosed by defecography were treated with rectopexy either by the Wells technique (9 patients) or by Orr's operation (15 patients). After follow-up from one to eight years, defecography demonstrated disappearance of the intussusception in 22 patients. None of the patients were completely relieved of their symptoms. Nine (41 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 21-64) were improved and 13 were unchanged (59 percent; 95 percent confidence limits: 36-79), with no difference between the two procedures. One patient with solitary rectal ulcer was improved, and the ulcer disappeared. Four patients with moderate preoperative incontinence became continent postoperatively, but obstructed defecation was only improved in two of these patients. It is concluded that rectal intussusception is probably a secondary phenomenon in patients with obstructed defecation and that a conservative attitude toward surgery should be adopted.

Key concepts: Medicine, Defecography, Intussusception (medical disorder), Defecation, Obstructed defecation, Rectal prolapse, Colorectal surgery, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Internal rectal intussusception — Research Paper | ScholarLens