2000Impact Assessment and Project AppraisalOpen access

Treatment of biodiversity impacts in a sample of US environmental impact statements

Samuel F. Atkinson, Sarika Bhatia, F. Andrew Schoolmaster, William T. Waller

Open full text 81 citations

Abstract

The objectives of the project discussed here were to identify the level of documentation in US environmental impact statements dealing with biodiversity impact assessment, determine whether, in the years following release in 1993 of US Council on Environmental Quality guidelines on biodiversity, the treatment of the subject has changed, and identify deficiencies. A systematic review process examined 35 US impact statements using a ‘biodiversity assessment index’ based on 19 review questions to score each statement. While our project examines a relatively small sample, data indicate that biodiversity assessment is lacking in US environmental impact statements. As a result, we have formulated a series of recommendations and tools for improving the treatment of biodiversity impact assessment.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objectives of the project discussed here were to identify the level of documentation in US environmental impact statements dealing with biodiversity impact assessment, determine whether, in the years following release in 1993 of US Council on Environmental Quality guidelines on biodiversity, the treatment of the subject has changed, and identify deficiencies. A systematic review process examined 35 US impact statements using a ‘biodiversity assessment index’ based on 19 review questions to score each statement. While our project examines a relatively small sample, data indicate that biodiversity assessment is lacking in US environmental impact statements. As a result, we have formulated a series of recommendations and tools for improving the treatment of biodiversity impact assessment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 81 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objectives of the project discussed here were to identify the level of documentation in US environmental impact statements dealing with biodiversity impact assessment, determine whether, in the years following release in 1993 of US Council on Environmental Quality guidelines on biodiversity, the treatment of the subject has changed, and identify deficiencies. A systematic review process examined 35 US impact statements using a ‘biodiversity assessment index’ based on 19 review questions to score each statement. While our project examines a relatively small sample, data indicate that biodiversity assessment is lacking in US environmental impact statements. As a result, we have formulated a series of recommendations and tools for improving the treatment of biodiversity impact assessment.

Key concepts: Biodiversity, Environmental impact statement, Environmental impact assessment, Documentation, Environmental resource management, Impact assessment, Sample (material), Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of biodiversity impacts in a sample of US environmental impact statements — Research Paper | ScholarLens