Contact dermatitis due to use of Octenisept® in wound care
Trevis Calow, Kristina Oberle, Leena Bruckner‐Tuderman, Thilo Jakob, Hauke Schumann
Abstract
Trevis Calow, Kristina Oberle, Leena Bruckner‐Tuderman, Thilo Jakob, Hauke Schumann
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Octenisept, containing 0.1 % octenidine/2 % phenoxyethanol, is a widely used antiseptic in modern wound management. It is considered to have a very low allergenic potential. Thus far, neither allergic nor irritant contact dermatitis to the product has been described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chronic wounds in 251 patients were treated with Octenisept; 11 developed signs of contact dermatitis. The symptoms improved after discontinuation of the antiseptic. Eight of these patients were patch tested to the antiseptic and its components. RESULTS: The eight patients all showed a positive reaction to the product. In at least three cases a reaction to the components cocamidopropyl betaine and phenoxyethanol was found, but not to octenidine dihydrochloride. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, more than three percent of the treated patients developed a contact dermatitis to the antiseptic. However, the differentiation between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis towards the ingredients of the antiseptic remains problematic.
OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Octenisept, containing 0.1 % octenidine/2 % phenoxyethanol, is a widely used antiseptic in modern wound management. It is considered to have a very low allergenic potential. Thus far, neither allergic nor irritant contact dermatitis to the product has been described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chronic wounds in 251 patients were treated with Octenisept; 11 developed signs of contact dermatitis. The symptoms improved after discontinuation of the antiseptic. Eight of these patients were patch tested to the antiseptic and its components. RESULTS: The eight patients all showed a positive reaction to the product. In at least three cases a reaction to the components cocamidopropyl betaine and phenoxyethanol was found, but not to octenidine dihydrochloride. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort, more than three percent of the treated patients developed a contact dermatitis to the antiseptic. However, the differentiation between allergic and irritant contact dermatitis towards the ingredients of the antiseptic remains problematic.
Key concepts: Antiseptic, Contact dermatitis, Medicine, Dermatology, Discontinuation, Allergic contact dermatitis, Irritant contact dermatitis, Wound care