2010Journal of Sustainable ForestryRequires access

Growth Response of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taedaL.) 3–5 Years After Plantation Establishment Using Different Management Intensities

Phillip D. Jones, Andrew W. Ezell, Stephen Demarais

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The upward trend of intensive management in Southern pine forests is expected to continue, both in area and intensity level. Much of the Mississippi Lower Coastal Plain (LCP) is managed intensively using some combination of mechanical site preparation, chemical site preparation, and herbaceous weed control (HWC). We studied pine growth response and competition control on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations 3–5 years following establishment using five combinations of chemical site preparation, mechanical site preparation, and HWC. Treatments were designated a priori as 1 (least intensive) through 5 (most intensive) largely on the basis of anticipated impact on the vegetation community. We measured pine height and diameter at breast height (dbh); woody stem density; hardwood basal area (BA); coverage of herbaceous plants, understory woody plants, and pine trees; and estimated differences in pine response using age-shift calculations at age 5. Pine height and dbh were correlated with treatment intensity; treatment 5 maintained an average advantage of 1.4-m height and 2.5-cm dbh over treatment 2, the least responsive treatment. Woody stem density varied widely and was not affected by treatment; understory woody coverage was also unaffected by treatment. Coverage of herbaceous plants was reduced in treatments receiving broadcast HWC, and in treatment 2, where slower establishment of pines may have acted as a release for competing woody plants. Age-shift gains relative to treatment 2 ranged from 0.4–1.0 years. Based on year 5 measurements of hardwood BA, it is likely that treatments 1 and 2 will fall further behind treatments 3–5 as the stands mature. Greatest control of competing vegetation and maximum growth of pines was achieved with the most intensive treatment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The upward trend of intensive management in Southern pine forests is expected to continue, both in area and intensity level. Much of the Mississippi Lower Coastal Plain (LCP) is managed intensively using some combination of mechanical site preparation, chemical site preparation, and herbaceous weed control (HWC). We studied pine growth response and competition control on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations 3–5 years following establishment using five combinations of chemical site preparation, mechanical site preparation, and HWC. Treatments were designated a priori as 1 (least intensive) through 5 (most intensive) largely on the basis of anticipated impact on the vegetation community. We measured pine height and diameter at breast height (dbh); woody stem density; hardwood basal area (BA); coverage of herbaceous plants, understory woody plants, and pine trees; and estimated differences in pine response using age-shift calculations at age 5. Pine height and dbh were correlated with treatment intensity; treatment 5 maintained an average advantage of 1.4-m height and 2.5-cm dbh over treatment 2, the least responsive treatment. Woody stem density varied widely and was not affected by treatment; understory woody coverage was also unaffected by treatment. Coverage of herbaceous plants was reduced in treatments receiving broadcast HWC, and in treatment 2, where slower establishment of pines may have acted as a release for competing woody plants. Age-shift gains relative to treatment 2 ranged from 0.4–1.0 years. Based on year 5 measurements of hardwood BA, it is likely that treatments 1 and 2 will fall further behind treatments 3–5 as the stands mature. Greatest control of competing vegetation and maximum growth of pines was achieved with the most intensive treatment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The upward trend of intensive management in Southern pine forests is expected to continue, both in area and intensity level. Much of the Mississippi Lower Coastal Plain (LCP) is managed intensively using some combination of mechanical site preparation, chemical site preparation, and herbaceous weed control (HWC). We studied pine growth response and competition control on loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations 3–5 years following establishment using five combinations of chemical site preparation, mechanical site preparation, and HWC. Treatments were designated a priori as 1 (least intensive) through 5 (most intensive) largely on the basis of anticipated impact on the vegetation community. We measured pine height and diameter at breast height (dbh); woody stem density; hardwood basal area (BA); coverage of herbaceous plants, understory woody plants, and pine trees; and estimated differences in pine response using age-shift calculations at age 5. Pine height and dbh were correlated with treatment intensity; treatment 5 maintained an average advantage of 1.4-m height and 2.5-cm dbh over treatment 2, the least responsive treatment. Woody stem density varied widely and was not affected by treatment; understory woody coverage was also unaffected by treatment. Coverage of herbaceous plants was reduced in treatments receiving broadcast HWC, and in treatment 2, where slower establishment of pines may have acted as a release for competing woody plants. Age-shift gains relative to treatment 2 ranged from 0.4–1.0 years. Based on year 5 measurements of hardwood BA, it is likely that treatments 1 and 2 will fall further behind treatments 3–5 as the stands mature. Greatest control of competing vegetation and maximum growth of pines was achieved with the most intensive treatment.

Key concepts: Herbaceous plant, Understory, Woody plant, Basal area, Diameter at breast height, Hardwood, Prescribed burn, Loblolly pine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Growth Response of Loblolly Pine (Pinus taedaL.) 3–5 Years After Plantation Establishment Using Different Management Intensities — Research Paper | ScholarLens