2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Field Validation of a Dynamic Model for an MFL ILI Tool in Gas Pipelines

K. K. Botros, H. Golshan

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Movements of pigs in gas pipelines are subject to more stringent parameters than that in liquid pipelines, predominantly due to the compressibility of gas. This is accentuated when the pig has to negotiate an upward inclination in the section of the pipeline, where the gravity force due to its weight can compromise the driving pressure drop across it. On a downward slope, a pig can accelerate to a velocity higher than the maximum required for the proper operation the instrumentation (which is typically around 5 m/s). On the other hand, in-line inspection tools often face challenges at wall thickness transitions or bends. The ability to accurately predict the functional performance of pigs is vital in the design and operation of pipelines and their associated pigging programs. The present paper provides a general formulation for the motion of pigs in an inclined pipeline section, taking into account effects of gas properties, wall friction, by-pass flow for speed control, differential pressure across the pig, seal efficiency, and gap flows, among other parameters. Comparison between model prediction and actual data from pigging a 158 km NPS 18 gas pipeline on TransCanada’s pipeline system in Alberta, Canada is presented. The elevation profile along this pipeline contains both positive (upward) and negative (downward) slopes. This is a lateral line which features 28 gas receipt points along the line, all were feeding in gas during the pigging program. Good agreement between model prediction and field data is demonstrated within ± 8% of St. Deviation. Example of a problem occurring at wall thickness transition at a valve section is demonstrated by a sudden stop of an MFL tool followed by a shootout at a higher velocity once the pressure is built up behind it.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Movements of pigs in gas pipelines are subject to more stringent parameters than that in liquid pipelines, predominantly due to the compressibility of gas. This is accentuated when the pig has to negotiate an upward inclination in the section of the pipeline, where the gravity force due to its weight can compromise the driving pressure drop across it. On a downward slope, a pig can accelerate to a velocity higher than the maximum required for the proper operation the instrumentation (which is typically around 5 m/s). On the other hand, in-line inspection tools often face challenges at wall thickness transitions or bends. The ability to accurately predict the functional performance of pigs is vital in the design and operation of pipelines and their associated pigging programs. The present paper provides a general formulation for the motion of pigs in an inclined pipeline section, taking into account effects of gas properties, wall friction, by-pass flow for speed control, differential pressure across the pig, seal efficiency, and gap flows, among other parameters. Comparison between model prediction and actual data from pigging a 158 km NPS 18 gas pipeline on TransCanada’s pipeline system in Alberta, Canada is presented. The elevation profile along this pipeline contains both positive (upward) and negative (downward) slopes. This is a lateral line which features 28 gas receipt points along the line, all were feeding in gas during the pigging program. Good agreement between model prediction and field data is demonstrated within ± 8% of St. Deviation. Example of a problem occurring at wall thickness transition at a valve section is demonstrated by a sudden stop of an MFL tool followed by a shootout at a higher velocity once the pressure is built up behind it.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Movements of pigs in gas pipelines are subject to more stringent parameters than that in liquid pipelines, predominantly due to the compressibility of gas. This is accentuated when the pig has to negotiate an upward inclination in the section of the pipeline, where the gravity force due to its weight can compromise the driving pressure drop across it. On a downward slope, a pig can accelerate to a velocity higher than the maximum required for the proper operation the instrumentation (which is typically around 5 m/s). On the other hand, in-line inspection tools often face challenges at wall thickness transitions or bends. The ability to accurately predict the functional performance of pigs is vital in the design and operation of pipelines and their associated pigging programs. The present paper provides a general formulation for the motion of pigs in an inclined pipeline section, taking into account effects of gas properties, wall friction, by-pass flow for speed control, differential pressure across the pig, seal efficiency, and gap flows, among other parameters. Comparison between model prediction and actual data from pigging a 158 km NPS 18 gas pipeline on TransCanada’s pipeline system in Alberta, Canada is presented. The elevation profile along this pipeline contains both positive (upward) and negative (downward) slopes. This is a lateral line which features 28 gas receipt points along the line, all were feeding in gas during the pigging program. Good agreement between model prediction and field data is demonstrated within ± 8% of St. Deviation. Example of a problem occurring at wall thickness transition at a valve section is demonstrated by a sudden stop of an MFL tool followed by a shootout at a higher velocity once the pressure is built up behind it.

Key concepts: Pigging, Pipeline transport, Pipeline (software), Compressibility, Marine engineering, Line (geometry), Engineering, Pressure drop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Field Validation of a Dynamic Model for an MFL ILI Tool in Gas Pipelines — Research Paper | ScholarLens