Present Status of Second-Order Closure Turbulence Models. I: Overview
S. Y. Jaw, C. J. Chen
Abstract
S. Y. Jaw, C. J. Chen
Abstract
An overview of the second-order closure turbulence models is presented in this paper. Models studied include the k-ε-eddy viscosity model, k-ε-nonlinear Reynolds stress model, differential Reynolds stress model, k-ε algebraic stress model, near-wall second-order closure model, low-Reynolds number model, two-layer model, and multiscale model, which cover the efforts of scientists and engineers over the past 50 years. However, at the present time, there exists no unified turbulence model. Each model applies successfully to some turbulent flows, while it predicts unsatisfactory results for other flows, especially for flows that are very different from those for which the models were calibrated. To improve the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the existing turbulence models, modifying, or even remodeling, the ε equation, the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and pressure-strain terms of the Reynolds stress, uiuj¯, equations is necessary.
OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An overview of the second-order closure turbulence models is presented in this paper. Models studied include the k-ε-eddy viscosity model, k-ε-nonlinear Reynolds stress model, differential Reynolds stress model, k-ε algebraic stress model, near-wall second-order closure model, low-Reynolds number model, two-layer model, and multiscale model, which cover the efforts of scientists and engineers over the past 50 years. However, at the present time, there exists no unified turbulence model. Each model applies successfully to some turbulent flows, while it predicts unsatisfactory results for other flows, especially for flows that are very different from those for which the models were calibrated. To improve the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the existing turbulence models, modifying, or even remodeling, the ε equation, the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and pressure-strain terms of the Reynolds stress, uiuj¯, equations is necessary.
Key concepts: Reynolds stress equation model, Turbulence, Reynolds stress, Turbulence modeling, K-epsilon turbulence model, Closure (psychology), K-omega turbulence model, Turbulence kinetic energy