1998Journal of Engineering MechanicsRequires access

Present Status of Second-Order Closure Turbulence Models. I: Overview

S. Y. Jaw, C. J. Chen

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

An overview of the second-order closure turbulence models is presented in this paper. Models studied include the k-ε-eddy viscosity model, k-ε-nonlinear Reynolds stress model, differential Reynolds stress model, k-ε algebraic stress model, near-wall second-order closure model, low-Reynolds number model, two-layer model, and multiscale model, which cover the efforts of scientists and engineers over the past 50 years. However, at the present time, there exists no unified turbulence model. Each model applies successfully to some turbulent flows, while it predicts unsatisfactory results for other flows, especially for flows that are very different from those for which the models were calibrated. To improve the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the existing turbulence models, modifying, or even remodeling, the ε equation, the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and pressure-strain terms of the Reynolds stress, uiuj¯, equations is necessary.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An overview of the second-order closure turbulence models is presented in this paper. Models studied include the k-ε-eddy viscosity model, k-ε-nonlinear Reynolds stress model, differential Reynolds stress model, k-ε algebraic stress model, near-wall second-order closure model, low-Reynolds number model, two-layer model, and multiscale model, which cover the efforts of scientists and engineers over the past 50 years. However, at the present time, there exists no unified turbulence model. Each model applies successfully to some turbulent flows, while it predicts unsatisfactory results for other flows, especially for flows that are very different from those for which the models were calibrated. To improve the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the existing turbulence models, modifying, or even remodeling, the ε equation, the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and pressure-strain terms of the Reynolds stress, uiuj¯, equations is necessary.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An overview of the second-order closure turbulence models is presented in this paper. Models studied include the k-ε-eddy viscosity model, k-ε-nonlinear Reynolds stress model, differential Reynolds stress model, k-ε algebraic stress model, near-wall second-order closure model, low-Reynolds number model, two-layer model, and multiscale model, which cover the efforts of scientists and engineers over the past 50 years. However, at the present time, there exists no unified turbulence model. Each model applies successfully to some turbulent flows, while it predicts unsatisfactory results for other flows, especially for flows that are very different from those for which the models were calibrated. To improve the prediction accuracy and the applicability of the existing turbulence models, modifying, or even remodeling, the ε equation, the dissipation rate of turbulent kinetic energy, and pressure-strain terms of the Reynolds stress, uiuj¯, equations is necessary.

Key concepts: Reynolds stress equation model, Turbulence, Reynolds stress, Turbulence modeling, K-epsilon turbulence model, Closure (psychology), K-omega turbulence model, Turbulence kinetic energy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Present Status of Second-Order Closure Turbulence Models. I: Overview — Research Paper | ScholarLens