2006Journal of Labor and SocietyRequires access

“THEY WANT TO DESTROY ME”: HOW CALIFORNIA'S FISCAL CRISIS BECAME A WAR ON “BIG GOVERNMENT UNIONS”

Daniel J. B. Mitchell

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In 2003, California voters recalled their governor and elected movie actor Arnold Schwarzenegger in his place. Two crises triggered this event: large ongoing state budget deficits and a failed electricity deregulation plan. In his first year, Governor Schwarzenegger dealt with the budget through large‐scale borrowing and had a reasonably cooperative relationship with the legislature. But in 2005, with the budget still in deficit, he threatened to go to the voters with a budget solution. That decision somehow morphed into a gubernatorial campaign against “big government unions.” Ultimately, after vast sums were spent on a November 2005 special election, all the governor's initiatives lost, including one offering “paycheck protection” to public union members. The decision to antagonize unions seemed to result from excess delegation of authority by the governor to outsiders and lack of control of his own staff.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2003, California voters recalled their governor and elected movie actor Arnold Schwarzenegger in his place. Two crises triggered this event: large ongoing state budget deficits and a failed electricity deregulation plan. In his first year, Governor Schwarzenegger dealt with the budget through large‐scale borrowing and had a reasonably cooperative relationship with the legislature. But in 2005, with the budget still in deficit, he threatened to go to the voters with a budget solution. That decision somehow morphed into a gubernatorial campaign against “big government unions.” Ultimately, after vast sums were spent on a November 2005 special election, all the governor's initiatives lost, including one offering “paycheck protection” to public union members. The decision to antagonize unions seemed to result from excess delegation of authority by the governor to outsiders and lack of control of his own staff.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2003, California voters recalled their governor and elected movie actor Arnold Schwarzenegger in his place. Two crises triggered this event: large ongoing state budget deficits and a failed electricity deregulation plan. In his first year, Governor Schwarzenegger dealt with the budget through large‐scale borrowing and had a reasonably cooperative relationship with the legislature. But in 2005, with the budget still in deficit, he threatened to go to the voters with a budget solution. That decision somehow morphed into a gubernatorial campaign against “big government unions.” Ultimately, after vast sums were spent on a November 2005 special election, all the governor's initiatives lost, including one offering “paycheck protection” to public union members. The decision to antagonize unions seemed to result from excess delegation of authority by the governor to outsiders and lack of control of his own staff.

Key concepts: Governor, Delegation, Government (linguistics), Legislature, State (computer science), Public administration, Deregulation, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“THEY WANT TO DESTROY ME”: HOW CALIFORNIA'S FISCAL CRISIS BECAME A WAR ON “BIG GOVERNMENT UNIONS” — Research Paper | ScholarLens