2012GeoCongress 2012Requires access

Laboratory and Field Measured Moduli of Unsurfaced Pavements on Weak Subgrade

Debakanta Mishra, Erol Tutumluer, Maziar Moaveni, Yuanjie Xiao

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

This paper presents findings on the effectiveness of field modulus determinations and modulus based assessment of constructed pavement foundation geomaterials, i.e. subgrade soil and base/subbase unbound aggregate material. Full-scale unsurfaced pavement test sections were constructed on controlled strength weak subgrades and tested to failure for studying effects of aggregate quality on pavement performance. Differences in aggregate quality were assessed by changes in aggregate properties such as particle angularity, fines content and plasticity of fines. In-situ moduli of the constructed layers were measured using both light weight deflectometer (LWD) and GeoGaugeTM type field devices. Tests were conducted on the engineered subgrade as well as on the finished aggregate layer surface with data collected consistently from the same locations using the two devices. Both the GeoGaugeTM and the LWD were successful in identifying anomalies in construction conditions, i.e., increasing or decreasing trends in moduli. However, field achieved dry densities and aggregate qualities could not be linked to the field modulus values, which also differed from the laboratory-measured resilient modulus properties.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper presents findings on the effectiveness of field modulus determinations and modulus based assessment of constructed pavement foundation geomaterials, i.e. subgrade soil and base/subbase unbound aggregate material. Full-scale unsurfaced pavement test sections were constructed on controlled strength weak subgrades and tested to failure for studying effects of aggregate quality on pavement performance. Differences in aggregate quality were assessed by changes in aggregate properties such as particle angularity, fines content and plasticity of fines. In-situ moduli of the constructed layers were measured using both light weight deflectometer (LWD) and GeoGaugeTM type field devices. Tests were conducted on the engineered subgrade as well as on the finished aggregate layer surface with data collected consistently from the same locations using the two devices. Both the GeoGaugeTM and the LWD were successful in identifying anomalies in construction conditions, i.e., increasing or decreasing trends in moduli. However, field achieved dry densities and aggregate qualities could not be linked to the field modulus values, which also differed from the laboratory-measured resilient modulus properties.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper presents findings on the effectiveness of field modulus determinations and modulus based assessment of constructed pavement foundation geomaterials, i.e. subgrade soil and base/subbase unbound aggregate material. Full-scale unsurfaced pavement test sections were constructed on controlled strength weak subgrades and tested to failure for studying effects of aggregate quality on pavement performance. Differences in aggregate quality were assessed by changes in aggregate properties such as particle angularity, fines content and plasticity of fines. In-situ moduli of the constructed layers were measured using both light weight deflectometer (LWD) and GeoGaugeTM type field devices. Tests were conducted on the engineered subgrade as well as on the finished aggregate layer surface with data collected consistently from the same locations using the two devices. Both the GeoGaugeTM and the LWD were successful in identifying anomalies in construction conditions, i.e., increasing or decreasing trends in moduli. However, field achieved dry densities and aggregate qualities could not be linked to the field modulus values, which also differed from the laboratory-measured resilient modulus properties.

Key concepts: Subgrade, Moduli, Field (mathematics), Geotechnical engineering, Environmental science, Geology, Mathematics, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laboratory and Field Measured Moduli of Unsurfaced Pavements on Weak Subgrade — Research Paper | ScholarLens