2013•The Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringRequires access

Investigation on alternative disposal methods for froth treatment tailings—part 1, disposal without asphaltene recovery

Yuming Xu, Tadek Dabros, Jianmin Kan

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

Abstract In paraffinic froth treatment, tailings from the tailings solvent recovery unit (TSRU) contain a significant fraction of asphaltenes. In current commercial practice, the TSRU tailings are disposed of in a tailings pond where the large asphaltene particles and coarse tailings settle and the fines form mature fine tailings (MFT). With increasing public concern about the environmental impact of tailings ponds and stricter government regulations on tailings disposal, the oil sand industry has increased efforts to find alternatives that eliminate or reduce the use of tailings ponds. In collaboration with Total E&P Canada (TEPCA), CanmetENERGY conducted an extensive research program to explore alternatives for TSRU tailings disposal. TSRU tailings were produced from TEPCA's froth treatment pilot tests conducted at the CanmetENERGY froth treatment facility. Various processes were investigated, including flocculation and thickening, filtration, and centrifugation. A large number of bench‐scale flocculation‐thickening and filtration tests were conducted, followed by numerous pilot‐scale flocculation‐thickening tests and centrifugation tests. The experimental results demonstrate that TSRU tailings can be flocculated and thickened to produce paste‐like sediment, and the hot water can be recovered and recycled. The thickened TSRU tailings have good water drainage and deposition of the sediment on a beach would result in further dewatering. Centrifugation of the TSRU tailings or filtration of the thickener underflow can produce a cake that appears to be very dry and suitable for disposal without pond containment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract In paraffinic froth treatment, tailings from the tailings solvent recovery unit (TSRU) contain a significant fraction of asphaltenes. In current commercial practice, the TSRU tailings are disposed of in a tailings pond where the large asphaltene particles and coarse tailings settle and the fines form mature fine tailings (MFT). With increasing public concern about the environmental impact of tailings ponds and stricter government regulations on tailings disposal, the oil sand industry has increased efforts to find alternatives that eliminate or reduce the use of tailings ponds. In collaboration with Total E&P Canada (TEPCA), CanmetENERGY conducted an extensive research program to explore alternatives for TSRU tailings disposal. TSRU tailings were produced from TEPCA's froth treatment pilot tests conducted at the CanmetENERGY froth treatment facility. Various processes were investigated, including flocculation and thickening, filtration, and centrifugation. A large number of bench‐scale flocculation‐thickening and filtration tests were conducted, followed by numerous pilot‐scale flocculation‐thickening tests and centrifugation tests. The experimental results demonstrate that TSRU tailings can be flocculated and thickened to produce paste‐like sediment, and the hot water can be recovered and recycled. The thickened TSRU tailings have good water drainage and deposition of the sediment on a beach would result in further dewatering. Centrifugation of the TSRU tailings or filtration of the thickener underflow can produce a cake that appears to be very dry and suitable for disposal without pond containment.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract In paraffinic froth treatment, tailings from the tailings solvent recovery unit (TSRU) contain a significant fraction of asphaltenes. In current commercial practice, the TSRU tailings are disposed of in a tailings pond where the large asphaltene particles and coarse tailings settle and the fines form mature fine tailings (MFT). With increasing public concern about the environmental impact of tailings ponds and stricter government regulations on tailings disposal, the oil sand industry has increased efforts to find alternatives that eliminate or reduce the use of tailings ponds. In collaboration with Total E&P Canada (TEPCA), CanmetENERGY conducted an extensive research program to explore alternatives for TSRU tailings disposal. TSRU tailings were produced from TEPCA's froth treatment pilot tests conducted at the CanmetENERGY froth treatment facility. Various processes were investigated, including flocculation and thickening, filtration, and centrifugation. A large number of bench‐scale flocculation‐thickening and filtration tests were conducted, followed by numerous pilot‐scale flocculation‐thickening tests and centrifugation tests. The experimental results demonstrate that TSRU tailings can be flocculated and thickened to produce paste‐like sediment, and the hot water can be recovered and recycled. The thickened TSRU tailings have good water drainage and deposition of the sediment on a beach would result in further dewatering. Centrifugation of the TSRU tailings or filtration of the thickener underflow can produce a cake that appears to be very dry and suitable for disposal without pond containment.

Key concepts: Tailings, Flocculation, Filtration (mathematics), Waste management, Dewatering, Environmental science, Arithmetic underflow, Oil sands

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Investigation on alternative disposal methods for froth treatment tailings—part 1, disposal without asphaltene recovery — Research Paper | ScholarLens