THE VALUE OF MUSCLE BIOPSY IN MYALGIA
Rahman A. Pourmand
Abstract
Rahman A. Pourmand
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with myalgia arc referred to neuromuscular centers for diagnosis and treatment where muscle biopsy is often performed to identify a possible organic or metabolic detect in the muscle. A review of large series that addresses the value of muscle biopsy in myalgia shows a wide range of morphological changes in the muscle (0 to 50%). In this review, I present my experience and that of others to provide a logical framework for the evaluation of such patients. REVIEW SUMMARY The wide range of abnormalities seen in the muscles in different series of cases is related to selection of patients, interpretation of morphological changes in the muscle, and the extent of studies performed with the muscle tissue, such as ultrastructural studies and enzymes measurement. CONCLUSION In my series of cases, five patients were found to have primary muscle disease. The present review indicates that for patients with myalgia who have a normal physical examination and laboratory studies, a routine study of muscle tissue does not provide enough information. However, muscle biopsy remains a valuable tool in thoroughly evaluated patients to help identity suspected morphological, biochemical, or ultrastructural abnormalities.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND Patients with myalgia arc referred to neuromuscular centers for diagnosis and treatment where muscle biopsy is often performed to identify a possible organic or metabolic detect in the muscle. A review of large series that addresses the value of muscle biopsy in myalgia shows a wide range of morphological changes in the muscle (0 to 50%). In this review, I present my experience and that of others to provide a logical framework for the evaluation of such patients. REVIEW SUMMARY The wide range of abnormalities seen in the muscles in different series of cases is related to selection of patients, interpretation of morphological changes in the muscle, and the extent of studies performed with the muscle tissue, such as ultrastructural studies and enzymes measurement. CONCLUSION In my series of cases, five patients were found to have primary muscle disease. The present review indicates that for patients with myalgia who have a normal physical examination and laboratory studies, a routine study of muscle tissue does not provide enough information. However, muscle biopsy remains a valuable tool in thoroughly evaluated patients to help identity suspected morphological, biochemical, or ultrastructural abnormalities.
Key concepts: myalgia, Medicine, Muscle biopsy, Biopsy, Muscle tissue, Pathology, Internal medicine