2005Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fieldsOpen access

Gluon distributions and fits using dipole cross sections

R. S. Thorne

Open full text 30 citations

Abstract

I investigate the relationship between the gluon distribution obtained using a dipole model fit to low-$x$ data on ${F}_{2}(x,{Q}^{2})$ and standard gluons obtained from global fits with the collinear factorization theorem at fixed order. I stress the necessity to do fits of this type carefully, and, in particular, to include the contribution from heavy flavors to the inclusive structure function. I find that the dipole cross section must be rather steeper than the gluon distribution, which at least partially explains why dipole model fits produce dipole cross sections growing quite strongly at small $x$, while DGLAP (Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi) based fits have valencelike, or even negative, small-$x$ gluons as inputs. However, I also find that the gluon distributions obtained from the dipole fits are much too small to match onto the conventional DGLAP gluons at high ${Q}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}50\text{ }\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^{2}$, where the two approaches should coincide. The main reason for this discrepancy is found to be the large approximations made in converting the dipole cross sections into structure functions using formulas which are designed only for asymptotically small $x$. The shortcomings in this step affect the accuracy of the extracted dipole cross sections in terms of size and shape, and hence also in terms of interpretation, at all scales.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

I investigate the relationship between the gluon distribution obtained using a dipole model fit to low-$x$ data on ${F}_{2}(x,{Q}^{2})$ and standard gluons obtained from global fits with the collinear factorization theorem at fixed order. I stress the necessity to do fits of this type carefully, and, in particular, to include the contribution from heavy flavors to the inclusive structure function. I find that the dipole cross section must be rather steeper than the gluon distribution, which at least partially explains why dipole model fits produce dipole cross sections growing quite strongly at small $x$, while DGLAP (Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi) based fits have valencelike, or even negative, small-$x$ gluons as inputs. However, I also find that the gluon distributions obtained from the dipole fits are much too small to match onto the conventional DGLAP gluons at high ${Q}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}50\text{ }\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^{2}$, where the two approaches should coincide. The main reason for this discrepancy is found to be the large approximations made in converting the dipole cross sections into structure functions using formulas which are designed only for asymptotically small $x$. The shortcomings in this step affect the accuracy of the extracted dipole cross sections in terms of size and shape, and hence also in terms of interpretation, at all scales.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

I investigate the relationship between the gluon distribution obtained using a dipole model fit to low-$x$ data on ${F}_{2}(x,{Q}^{2})$ and standard gluons obtained from global fits with the collinear factorization theorem at fixed order. I stress the necessity to do fits of this type carefully, and, in particular, to include the contribution from heavy flavors to the inclusive structure function. I find that the dipole cross section must be rather steeper than the gluon distribution, which at least partially explains why dipole model fits produce dipole cross sections growing quite strongly at small $x$, while DGLAP (Dokshitzer-Gribov-Lipatov-Altarelli-Parisi) based fits have valencelike, or even negative, small-$x$ gluons as inputs. However, I also find that the gluon distributions obtained from the dipole fits are much too small to match onto the conventional DGLAP gluons at high ${Q}^{2}\ensuremath{\sim}50\text{ }\mathrm{Ge}{\mathrm{V}}^{2}$, where the two approaches should coincide. The main reason for this discrepancy is found to be the large approximations made in converting the dipole cross sections into structure functions using formulas which are designed only for asymptotically small $x$. The shortcomings in this step affect the accuracy of the extracted dipole cross sections in terms of size and shape, and hence also in terms of interpretation, at all scales.

Key concepts: DGLAP, Gluon, Physics, Dipole, Factorization, Particle physics, Distribution function, Distribution (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Gluon distributions and fits using dipole cross sections — Research Paper | ScholarLens