1948The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Monaural and Binaural Threshold Sensitivity for Tones and for White Noise

Irwin Pollack

Open publisher page 50 citations

Abstract

Monaural and binaural thresholds of ten listeners were determined for a 1000-cycle tone and for a white noise. For each of the observers, the binaural threshold was found to be significantly lower than the monaural threshold when the two ears were “equated” in sensitivity, i.e. when the difference in sensitivity between the ears of a given observer was effectively canceled by experimental procedures. Furthermore, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly greater for the pure tone than the corresponding difference for the noise. Monaural and binaural thresholds were also determined with the two ears “equated” in sensitivity and with the two ears “mismatched” in sensitivity by fixed ratios. It was found that the difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear decreased as the difference in the effective stimulation at the two ears was increased. The difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear was found to be not statistically significant when the two ears were stimulated at sensation levels more than 6 db apart. The results of the present study fail to confirm the hypothesis that the auditory threshold is constant and equal to the sum of the effective acoustic powers at the two ears. For most of the observers, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly less than would be predicted by this hypothesis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Monaural and binaural thresholds of ten listeners were determined for a 1000-cycle tone and for a white noise. For each of the observers, the binaural threshold was found to be significantly lower than the monaural threshold when the two ears were “equated” in sensitivity, i.e. when the difference in sensitivity between the ears of a given observer was effectively canceled by experimental procedures. Furthermore, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly greater for the pure tone than the corresponding difference for the noise. Monaural and binaural thresholds were also determined with the two ears “equated” in sensitivity and with the two ears “mismatched” in sensitivity by fixed ratios. It was found that the difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear decreased as the difference in the effective stimulation at the two ears was increased. The difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear was found to be not statistically significant when the two ears were stimulated at sensation levels more than 6 db apart. The results of the present study fail to confirm the hypothesis that the auditory threshold is constant and equal to the sum of the effective acoustic powers at the two ears. For most of the observers, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly less than would be predicted by this hypothesis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 50 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Monaural and binaural thresholds of ten listeners were determined for a 1000-cycle tone and for a white noise. For each of the observers, the binaural threshold was found to be significantly lower than the monaural threshold when the two ears were “equated” in sensitivity, i.e. when the difference in sensitivity between the ears of a given observer was effectively canceled by experimental procedures. Furthermore, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly greater for the pure tone than the corresponding difference for the noise. Monaural and binaural thresholds were also determined with the two ears “equated” in sensitivity and with the two ears “mismatched” in sensitivity by fixed ratios. It was found that the difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear decreased as the difference in the effective stimulation at the two ears was increased. The difference between the binaural threshold and the threshold of the better ear was found to be not statistically significant when the two ears were stimulated at sensation levels more than 6 db apart. The results of the present study fail to confirm the hypothesis that the auditory threshold is constant and equal to the sum of the effective acoustic powers at the two ears. For most of the observers, the difference between the monaural and binaural thresholds was found to be significantly less than would be predicted by this hypothesis.

Key concepts: Monaural, Binaural recording, Audiology, Acoustics, Sensitivity (control systems), Noise (video), Just-noticeable difference, Significant difference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Monaural and Binaural Threshold Sensitivity for Tones and for White Noise — Research Paper | ScholarLens