2011The Southwestern NaturalistRequires access

Diet of Cougars (Puma concolor) Following a Decline in a Population of Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus): Lack of Evidence for Switching Prey

Jeffrey T. Villepique, Becky M. Pierce, Vernon C. Bleich, R. Terry Bowyer

Open publisher page 19 citations

Abstract

We investigated diet of cougars (Puma concolor) in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, following a decline in the population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer declined 84% from 1985 to 1991, a period concurrent with declines in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae; an endangered taxon). An index to numbers of cougars lagged behind those declines, with a reduction of ca. 50% during 1992–1996. We determined diet of cougars by analysis of fecal samples collected during 1991–1995, when the population of mule deer was <25% of its former size. Mule deer was in 79% of 178 feces in winter and 58% of 74 feces in summer. Although most (69%) fecal samples in winter were <5 km from, or within (25%) winter range of bighorn sheep, none contained evidence of bighorn sheep. One fecal sample in summer contained remains of bighorn sheep, indicating that those ungulates were not an important component of the diet during our investigation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We investigated diet of cougars (Puma concolor) in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, following a decline in the population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer declined 84% from 1985 to 1991, a period concurrent with declines in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae; an endangered taxon). An index to numbers of cougars lagged behind those declines, with a reduction of ca. 50% during 1992–1996. We determined diet of cougars by analysis of fecal samples collected during 1991–1995, when the population of mule deer was <25% of its former size. Mule deer was in 79% of 178 feces in winter and 58% of 74 feces in summer. Although most (69%) fecal samples in winter were <5 km from, or within (25%) winter range of bighorn sheep, none contained evidence of bighorn sheep. One fecal sample in summer contained remains of bighorn sheep, indicating that those ungulates were not an important component of the diet during our investigation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We investigated diet of cougars (Puma concolor) in the eastern Sierra Nevada, California, following a decline in the population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer declined 84% from 1985 to 1991, a period concurrent with declines in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis sierrae; an endangered taxon). An index to numbers of cougars lagged behind those declines, with a reduction of ca. 50% during 1992–1996. We determined diet of cougars by analysis of fecal samples collected during 1991–1995, when the population of mule deer was <25% of its former size. Mule deer was in 79% of 178 feces in winter and 58% of 74 feces in summer. Although most (69%) fecal samples in winter were <5 km from, or within (25%) winter range of bighorn sheep, none contained evidence of bighorn sheep. One fecal sample in summer contained remains of bighorn sheep, indicating that those ungulates were not an important component of the diet during our investigation.

Key concepts: Odocoileus, Ovis canadensis, Puma, Feces, Biology, Population, Predation, Endangered species

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diet of Cougars (Puma concolor) Following a Decline in a Population of Mule Deer (Odocoileus hemionus): Lack of Evidence for Switching Prey — Research Paper | ScholarLens