2001•˜The œAmerican journal of pediatric hematology/oncologyRequires access

Cytochemical Staining and Flow Cytometry Methods Applied to the Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia in the Pediatric Population: An Assessment of Relative Usefulness

Paulette Mhawech, G J Buffone, Shakila P. Khan, Mary V. Gresik

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytochemical staining has been used in the diagnosis of acute leukemia for more than 20 years. The general availability of flow cytometers and an extensive panel of antibody reagents useful for characterizing blood cell lineage question the usefulness of continuing routine use of the cytochemical staining for the diagnosis of acute leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Test results were evaluated in 122 (n = 122; 112 with acute lymphocytic leukemia and 10 with acute myeloid leukemia) patients selected from among 320 patients with acute leukemia at Texas Children's Hospital in 1997 and 1998. Results were selected for review if the clinical encounter represented the initial diagnostic work-up and if data were available from cytochemical staining and flow cytometry studies. RESULTS: Cell lineage classification derived from flow cytometry and cytochemical stains were in agreement in all cases. Definitive diagnoses were feasible using flow cytometry results alone in 120 of 122 patients (98.4%) as compared with only 99 of 122 patients (81.2%) when only cytochemical staining results were considered. In two patients with inconclusive flow cytometry results, cytochemical staining alone provided information sufficient for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that with few exceptions, flow cytometry studies alone provide sufficient information for diagnosis and management of acute leukemia in children. Nevertheless, cytochemical staining should be available for those cases in which flow cytometry results fail to allow a definitive diagnosis. A modified testing protocol is recommended.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Cytochemical staining has been used in the diagnosis of acute leukemia for more than 20 years. The general availability of flow cytometers and an extensive panel of antibody reagents useful for characterizing blood cell lineage question the usefulness of continuing routine use of the cytochemical staining for the diagnosis of acute leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Test results were evaluated in 122 (n = 122; 112 with acute lymphocytic leukemia and 10 with acute myeloid leukemia) patients selected from among 320 patients with acute leukemia at Texas Children's Hospital in 1997 and 1998. Results were selected for review if the clinical encounter represented the initial diagnostic work-up and if data were available from cytochemical staining and flow cytometry studies. RESULTS: Cell lineage classification derived from flow cytometry and cytochemical stains were in agreement in all cases. Definitive diagnoses were feasible using flow cytometry results alone in 120 of 122 patients (98.4%) as compared with only 99 of 122 patients (81.2%) when only cytochemical staining results were considered. In two patients with inconclusive flow cytometry results, cytochemical staining alone provided information sufficient for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that with few exceptions, flow cytometry studies alone provide sufficient information for diagnosis and management of acute leukemia in children. Nevertheless, cytochemical staining should be available for those cases in which flow cytometry results fail to allow a definitive diagnosis. A modified testing protocol is recommended.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Cytochemical staining has been used in the diagnosis of acute leukemia for more than 20 years. The general availability of flow cytometers and an extensive panel of antibody reagents useful for characterizing blood cell lineage question the usefulness of continuing routine use of the cytochemical staining for the diagnosis of acute leukemia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Test results were evaluated in 122 (n = 122; 112 with acute lymphocytic leukemia and 10 with acute myeloid leukemia) patients selected from among 320 patients with acute leukemia at Texas Children's Hospital in 1997 and 1998. Results were selected for review if the clinical encounter represented the initial diagnostic work-up and if data were available from cytochemical staining and flow cytometry studies. RESULTS: Cell lineage classification derived from flow cytometry and cytochemical stains were in agreement in all cases. Definitive diagnoses were feasible using flow cytometry results alone in 120 of 122 patients (98.4%) as compared with only 99 of 122 patients (81.2%) when only cytochemical staining results were considered. In two patients with inconclusive flow cytometry results, cytochemical staining alone provided information sufficient for diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that with few exceptions, flow cytometry studies alone provide sufficient information for diagnosis and management of acute leukemia in children. Nevertheless, cytochemical staining should be available for those cases in which flow cytometry results fail to allow a definitive diagnosis. A modified testing protocol is recommended.

Key concepts: Flow cytometry, Staining, Leukemia, Acute leukemia, Medicine, Myeloid leukemia, Pathology, Cytometry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cytochemical Staining and Flow Cytometry Methods Applied to the Diagnosis of Acute Leukemia in the Pediatric Population: An Assessment of Relative Usefulness — Research Paper | ScholarLens