2009•Communication and Critical/Cultural StudiesRequires access

The Filter, the Alarm System, and the Sounding Board: Critical and Warning Functions of the Public Sphere

Thomas Britten Hove

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This analysis clarifies and extends several underdeveloped but significant new components of Jürgen Habermas's public sphere theory. At center stage is the distinction between public communication's critical and warning functions. Communication scholars have long recognized the public sphere's critical function of filtering public opinion. But few have acknowledged its warning function of alerting political decision-makers about widespread but privately experienced social problems. This warning function deserves more attention for two reasons. First, it clarifies how the political public sphere interacts with civil society and the state through means other than rational-critical debate. Second, it represents a phase of public communication in which strategic action serves as a necessary antecedent to formalized decision-making. Implications for critical theories of the public sphere and communicative action are discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This analysis clarifies and extends several underdeveloped but significant new components of Jürgen Habermas's public sphere theory. At center stage is the distinction between public communication's critical and warning functions. Communication scholars have long recognized the public sphere's critical function of filtering public opinion. But few have acknowledged its warning function of alerting political decision-makers about widespread but privately experienced social problems. This warning function deserves more attention for two reasons. First, it clarifies how the political public sphere interacts with civil society and the state through means other than rational-critical debate. Second, it represents a phase of public communication in which strategic action serves as a necessary antecedent to formalized decision-making. Implications for critical theories of the public sphere and communicative action are discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This analysis clarifies and extends several underdeveloped but significant new components of Jürgen Habermas's public sphere theory. At center stage is the distinction between public communication's critical and warning functions. Communication scholars have long recognized the public sphere's critical function of filtering public opinion. But few have acknowledged its warning function of alerting political decision-makers about widespread but privately experienced social problems. This warning function deserves more attention for two reasons. First, it clarifies how the political public sphere interacts with civil society and the state through means other than rational-critical debate. Second, it represents a phase of public communication in which strategic action serves as a necessary antecedent to formalized decision-making. Implications for critical theories of the public sphere and communicative action are discussed.

Key concepts: Public sphere, Communicative action, Politics, Action (physics), Function (biology), Private sphere, Warning system, Civil society

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Filter, the Alarm System, and the Sounding Board: Critical and Warning Functions of the Public Sphere — Research Paper | ScholarLens