1998Dermatologic SurgeryRequires access

Earlobe Reconstruction Using a Subcutaneous Island Pedicle Flap after Resection of “Earlobe Keloid”

Mitsuo Hatoko, Masamitsu Kuwahara, Aiko Shiba, Hideyuki Tada, Tadashi Okazaki, Tsutomu Muramatsu, Toshihiko Shirai

Open publisher page 31 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large keloid of the earlobe is a difficult case in which to obtain a satisfying result by nonsurgical therapies. In this case, surgical resection of keloids should be considered as a first step in therapy. However, it is difficult to reconstruct the earlobe cosmetically after resection of the lesion. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the usefulness of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap in earlobe keloid surgery. METHODS: Five earlobe keloids in five patients (four females and one male) were resected and reconstructed by subcutaneous island pedicle flap. RESULTS: In all patients, there were no keloid recurrences and no adjuvant therapies used during the follow-up periods, which ranged from 10 to 26 months. The reconstructed earlobes were almost symmetrical. CONCLUSION: In the selected cases, use of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap is a viable method to be considered for reconstruction after resection of earlobe keloids.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: A large keloid of the earlobe is a difficult case in which to obtain a satisfying result by nonsurgical therapies. In this case, surgical resection of keloids should be considered as a first step in therapy. However, it is difficult to reconstruct the earlobe cosmetically after resection of the lesion. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the usefulness of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap in earlobe keloid surgery. METHODS: Five earlobe keloids in five patients (four females and one male) were resected and reconstructed by subcutaneous island pedicle flap. RESULTS: In all patients, there were no keloid recurrences and no adjuvant therapies used during the follow-up periods, which ranged from 10 to 26 months. The reconstructed earlobes were almost symmetrical. CONCLUSION: In the selected cases, use of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap is a viable method to be considered for reconstruction after resection of earlobe keloids.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 31 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: A large keloid of the earlobe is a difficult case in which to obtain a satisfying result by nonsurgical therapies. In this case, surgical resection of keloids should be considered as a first step in therapy. However, it is difficult to reconstruct the earlobe cosmetically after resection of the lesion. OBJECTIVE: To discuss the usefulness of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap in earlobe keloid surgery. METHODS: Five earlobe keloids in five patients (four females and one male) were resected and reconstructed by subcutaneous island pedicle flap. RESULTS: In all patients, there were no keloid recurrences and no adjuvant therapies used during the follow-up periods, which ranged from 10 to 26 months. The reconstructed earlobes were almost symmetrical. CONCLUSION: In the selected cases, use of the subcutaneous island pedicle flap is a viable method to be considered for reconstruction after resection of earlobe keloids.

Key concepts: Earlobe, Medicine, Keloid, Surgery, Resection, Lesion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Earlobe Reconstruction Using a Subcutaneous Island Pedicle Flap after Resection of “Earlobe Keloid” — Research Paper | ScholarLens