2004International Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosRequires access

NEWTON'S VERSUS HALLEY'S METHOD: A DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH

Gareth E. Roberts, JEREMY HORGAN-KOBELSKI

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

We compare the iterative root-finding methods of Newton and Halley applied to cubic polynomials in the complex plane. Of specific interest are those "bad" polynomials for which a given numerical method contains an attracting cycle distinct from the roots. This implies the existence of an open set of initial guesses whose iterates do not converge to one of the roots (i.e. the numerical method fails). Searching for a set of bad parameter values leads to Mandelbrot-like sets and interesting figures in the parameter plane. We provide some analytic and geometric arguments to explain the contrasting parameter plane pictures. In particular, we show that there exists a sequence of parameter values λn for which the corresponding numerical method has a superattracting n cycle. The λn lie at the centers of a converging sequence of Mandelbrot-like sets.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compare the iterative root-finding methods of Newton and Halley applied to cubic polynomials in the complex plane. Of specific interest are those "bad" polynomials for which a given numerical method contains an attracting cycle distinct from the roots. This implies the existence of an open set of initial guesses whose iterates do not converge to one of the roots (i.e. the numerical method fails). Searching for a set of bad parameter values leads to Mandelbrot-like sets and interesting figures in the parameter plane. We provide some analytic and geometric arguments to explain the contrasting parameter plane pictures. In particular, we show that there exists a sequence of parameter values λn for which the corresponding numerical method has a superattracting n cycle. The λn lie at the centers of a converging sequence of Mandelbrot-like sets.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compare the iterative root-finding methods of Newton and Halley applied to cubic polynomials in the complex plane. Of specific interest are those "bad" polynomials for which a given numerical method contains an attracting cycle distinct from the roots. This implies the existence of an open set of initial guesses whose iterates do not converge to one of the roots (i.e. the numerical method fails). Searching for a set of bad parameter values leads to Mandelbrot-like sets and interesting figures in the parameter plane. We provide some analytic and geometric arguments to explain the contrasting parameter plane pictures. In particular, we show that there exists a sequence of parameter values λn for which the corresponding numerical method has a superattracting n cycle. The λn lie at the centers of a converging sequence of Mandelbrot-like sets.

Key concepts: Mandelbrot set, Julia set, Newton fractal, Mathematics, Iterated function, Complex plane, Sequence (biology), Complex quadratic polynomial

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NEWTON'S VERSUS HALLEY'S METHOD: A DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH — Research Paper | ScholarLens