Anthropic Bound on the Cosmological Constant
Steven Weinberg
Abstract
Steven Weinberg
Abstract
In recent cosmological models, there is an "anthropic" upper bound on the cosmological constant $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$. It is argued here that in universes that do not recollapse, the only such bound on $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$ is that it should not be so large as to prevent the formation of gravitationally bound states. It turns out that the bound is quite large. A cosmological constant that is within 1 or 2 orders of magnitude of its upper bound would help with the missing-mass and age problems, but may be ruled out by galaxy number counts. If so, we may conclude that anthropic considerations do not explain the smallness of the cosmological constant.
OpenAlex reports 1170 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In recent cosmological models, there is an "anthropic" upper bound on the cosmological constant $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$. It is argued here that in universes that do not recollapse, the only such bound on $\ensuremath{\Lambda}$ is that it should not be so large as to prevent the formation of gravitationally bound states. It turns out that the bound is quite large. A cosmological constant that is within 1 or 2 orders of magnitude of its upper bound would help with the missing-mass and age problems, but may be ruled out by galaxy number counts. If so, we may conclude that anthropic considerations do not explain the smallness of the cosmological constant.
Key concepts: Anthropic principle, Cosmological constant, Physics, Upper and lower bounds, Constant (computer programming), Bound state, Lambda, Theoretical physics