1983British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyOpen access

Effects of oral and intravenous midazolam, triazolam and flunitrazepam on the sleep‐wakefulness cycle of rabbits.

Richard Scherschlicht, J Marias

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

The effect of the new, short-acting benzodiazepine, midazolam as well as that of triazolam and flunitrazepam on the sleep of rabbits was recorded for 6 h. Midazolam at 1 mg kg-1 i.v. augmented both rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and non-REM sleep (NREMS) only in the first half of the observation period. At 10 mg kg-1 i.v., NREMS was further increased in the first and, to a lesser degree, in the second 3-h period, while REMS was suppressed. Both doses were less effective orally than intravenously. Qualitatively, the effect of triazolam 0.01 and 0.1 mg kg-1 i.v. was very similar to that of the corresponding low and high intravenous doses of midazolam, except that the high dose of triazolam had a prolonged effect on total sleep time. Like midazolam, triazolam was substantially less effective orally than intravenously. Flunitrazepam at 0.1 and 1 mg kg-1 i.v. produced almost the same effects as midazolam and triazolam at the respective low and high intravenous doses, but had a longer duration of action. In contrast to midazolam and triazolam, flunitrazepam was almost as active orally as intravenously.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effect of the new, short-acting benzodiazepine, midazolam as well as that of triazolam and flunitrazepam on the sleep of rabbits was recorded for 6 h. Midazolam at 1 mg kg-1 i.v. augmented both rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and non-REM sleep (NREMS) only in the first half of the observation period. At 10 mg kg-1 i.v., NREMS was further increased in the first and, to a lesser degree, in the second 3-h period, while REMS was suppressed. Both doses were less effective orally than intravenously. Qualitatively, the effect of triazolam 0.01 and 0.1 mg kg-1 i.v. was very similar to that of the corresponding low and high intravenous doses of midazolam, except that the high dose of triazolam had a prolonged effect on total sleep time. Like midazolam, triazolam was substantially less effective orally than intravenously. Flunitrazepam at 0.1 and 1 mg kg-1 i.v. produced almost the same effects as midazolam and triazolam at the respective low and high intravenous doses, but had a longer duration of action. In contrast to midazolam and triazolam, flunitrazepam was almost as active orally as intravenously.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effect of the new, short-acting benzodiazepine, midazolam as well as that of triazolam and flunitrazepam on the sleep of rabbits was recorded for 6 h. Midazolam at 1 mg kg-1 i.v. augmented both rapid eye movement sleep (REMS) and non-REM sleep (NREMS) only in the first half of the observation period. At 10 mg kg-1 i.v., NREMS was further increased in the first and, to a lesser degree, in the second 3-h period, while REMS was suppressed. Both doses were less effective orally than intravenously. Qualitatively, the effect of triazolam 0.01 and 0.1 mg kg-1 i.v. was very similar to that of the corresponding low and high intravenous doses of midazolam, except that the high dose of triazolam had a prolonged effect on total sleep time. Like midazolam, triazolam was substantially less effective orally than intravenously. Flunitrazepam at 0.1 and 1 mg kg-1 i.v. produced almost the same effects as midazolam and triazolam at the respective low and high intravenous doses, but had a longer duration of action. In contrast to midazolam and triazolam, flunitrazepam was almost as active orally as intravenously.

Key concepts: Triazolam, Midazolam, Flunitrazepam, Benzodiazepine, Anesthesia, Hypnotic, Flumazenil, Sedative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of oral and intravenous midazolam, triazolam and flunitrazepam on the sleep‐wakefulness cycle of rabbits. — Research Paper | ScholarLens