2014•Journal of Hydraulic EngineeringRequires access

Laminar and Turbulent Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids in Open Channels for Different Cross-Sectional Shapes

J. H. Burger, Rainer Haldenwang, N. J. Alderman

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

New models for the prediction of laminar and turbulent flow of non-Newtonian fluids in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes are proposed. These models are compared with three previously published models for laminar flow and five previously published models for turbulent flow using a recently extended experimental database for non-Newtonian flow in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes. Flow of three different fluids (aqueous carboxymethylcellulose solutions and kaolin and bentonite suspensions) was investigated in open channels of four different cross sections (rectangular, semicircular, trapezoidal, and triangular) at slopes varying from 1 to 5°. The new laminar model gave a closer fit to the data than those from the previously published models. However, the presence of the yield stress still presents a problem that makes flow prediction in laminar flow for such fluids not very accurate. The new model for turbulent flow gave the best fit to the flow data compared with the five previously published models, which fell within a 30% error margin. A particular advantage of both new models is that they are applicable for all the different fluids tested and the four open channel cross-sectional shapes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

New models for the prediction of laminar and turbulent flow of non-Newtonian fluids in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes are proposed. These models are compared with three previously published models for laminar flow and five previously published models for turbulent flow using a recently extended experimental database for non-Newtonian flow in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes. Flow of three different fluids (aqueous carboxymethylcellulose solutions and kaolin and bentonite suspensions) was investigated in open channels of four different cross sections (rectangular, semicircular, trapezoidal, and triangular) at slopes varying from 1 to 5°. The new laminar model gave a closer fit to the data than those from the previously published models. However, the presence of the yield stress still presents a problem that makes flow prediction in laminar flow for such fluids not very accurate. The new model for turbulent flow gave the best fit to the flow data compared with the five previously published models, which fell within a 30% error margin. A particular advantage of both new models is that they are applicable for all the different fluids tested and the four open channel cross-sectional shapes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

New models for the prediction of laminar and turbulent flow of non-Newtonian fluids in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes are proposed. These models are compared with three previously published models for laminar flow and five previously published models for turbulent flow using a recently extended experimental database for non-Newtonian flow in open channels of different cross-sectional shapes. Flow of three different fluids (aqueous carboxymethylcellulose solutions and kaolin and bentonite suspensions) was investigated in open channels of four different cross sections (rectangular, semicircular, trapezoidal, and triangular) at slopes varying from 1 to 5°. The new laminar model gave a closer fit to the data than those from the previously published models. However, the presence of the yield stress still presents a problem that makes flow prediction in laminar flow for such fluids not very accurate. The new model for turbulent flow gave the best fit to the flow data compared with the five previously published models, which fell within a 30% error margin. A particular advantage of both new models is that they are applicable for all the different fluids tested and the four open channel cross-sectional shapes.

Key concepts: Laminar flow, Turbulence, Open-channel flow, Mechanics, Flow (mathematics), Newtonian fluid, Laminar sublayer, Flow separation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Laminar and Turbulent Flow of Non-Newtonian Fluids in Open Channels for Different Cross-Sectional Shapes — Research Paper | ScholarLens