2008IEEE SoftwareRequires access

A Classification System for Testing, Part 2

Robert L. Glass

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

This article looks at what happens when you combine the four goal-driven approaches to testing classification (requirements-driven, statistics-driven, and risk-driven) with the three phase-driven approaches (unit testing, integration testing, and system testing).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article looks at what happens when you combine the four goal-driven approaches to testing classification (requirements-driven, statistics-driven, and risk-driven) with the three phase-driven approaches (unit testing, integration testing, and system testing).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article looks at what happens when you combine the four goal-driven approaches to testing classification (requirements-driven, statistics-driven, and risk-driven) with the three phase-driven approaches (unit testing, integration testing, and system testing).

Key concepts: Integration testing, Unit testing, Non-regression testing, Test strategy, System testing, Risk-based testing, System integration testing, White-box testing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Classification System for Testing, Part 2 — Research Paper | ScholarLens