COMPARISON OF ENERGY EFFICIENCY BETWEEN A ROLLER MILL AND A HAMMER MILL
Q. Fang, I. Bölöni, Ekramul Haque, C. K. Spillman
Abstract
Q. Fang, I. Bölöni, Ekramul Haque, C. K. Spillman
Abstract
AIt is generally believed that roller mills utilize energy more efficiently than hammer mills (Silver, 1931;Puckett and Daum, 1968; Appel, 1987). To verify this, a completely randomized factorial experimental design (CRD) withtwo replications was constructed: a total of 72 grinding tests was conducted to compare the energy efficiency between aroller mill and a hammer mill. Energy data were collected using a computerized data acquisition system and a watt-hourmeter for the roller mill and the hammer mill, respectively. A mixture of hard red winter wheat (HRW) varieties was usedto conduct the experiment. To make the comparison meaningful, the parameters for the two machines were set so that theground material characteristics from both were almost identical. For roller mill grinding, roll gap was the mostsignificant factor affecting energy requirement, followed by the roll speed differential. For hammer mill grinding, screenopening size had the most significant effect. For both mills, feed rate was not significant; and energy efficiencies wereabout the same.
OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
AIt is generally believed that roller mills utilize energy more efficiently than hammer mills (Silver, 1931;Puckett and Daum, 1968; Appel, 1987). To verify this, a completely randomized factorial experimental design (CRD) withtwo replications was constructed: a total of 72 grinding tests was conducted to compare the energy efficiency between aroller mill and a hammer mill. Energy data were collected using a computerized data acquisition system and a watt-hourmeter for the roller mill and the hammer mill, respectively. A mixture of hard red winter wheat (HRW) varieties was usedto conduct the experiment. To make the comparison meaningful, the parameters for the two machines were set so that theground material characteristics from both were almost identical. For roller mill grinding, roll gap was the mostsignificant factor affecting energy requirement, followed by the roll speed differential. For hammer mill grinding, screenopening size had the most significant effect. For both mills, feed rate was not significant; and energy efficiencies wereabout the same.
Key concepts: Mill, Hammer, Roller mill, Engineering, Grinding, Energy (signal processing), Specific energy, Mechanical engineering