1981The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis

Judy R. Dubno, Harry N. Levitt

Open publisher page 100 citations

Abstract

Acoustic measurements of nonsense syllables in quiet and in noise were used to predict the pattern of consonant confusions made under those conditions. Eleven sets of nonsense syllables were presented to normal-hearing subjects in quiet and at a +5 dB speech-to-noise ratio, at five speech levels. A set of acoustic characteristics of the speech stimuli were chosen for analysis and measured using digital processing techniques. Results of the recognition task revealed significant effects of consonant voicing, position and vowel context on syllable recognition. The performance-intensity function of the quiet condition rises more steeply than the function obtained in noise. The effect of noise on consonant recognition is dependent upon the manner in which the consonant is produced, and the location of maximum constriction. Differences in the absolute values of the acoustic parameters of syllable pairs were used to predict their percentage of confusion. A set of acoustic variables was isolated which was found to be the best predictor of confusion percentages. Although the sets of acoustic variables were different for various syllable types and test conditions, three variables (consonant energy, consonant spectral peaks, consonant-to-noise ratio) were used in a majority of the predictions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Acoustic measurements of nonsense syllables in quiet and in noise were used to predict the pattern of consonant confusions made under those conditions. Eleven sets of nonsense syllables were presented to normal-hearing subjects in quiet and at a +5 dB speech-to-noise ratio, at five speech levels. A set of acoustic characteristics of the speech stimuli were chosen for analysis and measured using digital processing techniques. Results of the recognition task revealed significant effects of consonant voicing, position and vowel context on syllable recognition. The performance-intensity function of the quiet condition rises more steeply than the function obtained in noise. The effect of noise on consonant recognition is dependent upon the manner in which the consonant is produced, and the location of maximum constriction. Differences in the absolute values of the acoustic parameters of syllable pairs were used to predict their percentage of confusion. A set of acoustic variables was isolated which was found to be the best predictor of confusion percentages. Although the sets of acoustic variables were different for various syllable types and test conditions, three variables (consonant energy, consonant spectral peaks, consonant-to-noise ratio) were used in a majority of the predictions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 100 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Acoustic measurements of nonsense syllables in quiet and in noise were used to predict the pattern of consonant confusions made under those conditions. Eleven sets of nonsense syllables were presented to normal-hearing subjects in quiet and at a +5 dB speech-to-noise ratio, at five speech levels. A set of acoustic characteristics of the speech stimuli were chosen for analysis and measured using digital processing techniques. Results of the recognition task revealed significant effects of consonant voicing, position and vowel context on syllable recognition. The performance-intensity function of the quiet condition rises more steeply than the function obtained in noise. The effect of noise on consonant recognition is dependent upon the manner in which the consonant is produced, and the location of maximum constriction. Differences in the absolute values of the acoustic parameters of syllable pairs were used to predict their percentage of confusion. A set of acoustic variables was isolated which was found to be the best predictor of confusion percentages. Although the sets of acoustic variables were different for various syllable types and test conditions, three variables (consonant energy, consonant spectral peaks, consonant-to-noise ratio) were used in a majority of the predictions.

Key concepts: Consonant, Stop consonant, Voice, QUIET, Noise (video), Speech recognition, Mathematics, Context (archaeology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens