1999Cambridge Review of International AffairsRequires access

Theories, practices and postmodernism in international relations 1

Richard Devetak

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

To begin, this paper outlines three different senses of postmodernism by examining the writing of Jean‐François Lyotard. It then turns to Friedrich Nietzsche to focus more sharply on two central aspects of postmodern, or better, post‐structuralist, theories: perspectivism and the critique of subjectivity. How these two aspects of post‐structuralism have been utilised in the study of international relations is explained. In particular, the author highlights the epistemological and political implications of post‐structuralism for the study of international relations. Finally the paper concludes by returning to the question of how post‐structuralism re‐evaluates the relationship between theory and practice. It suggests that trite invocations of ‘the real world’ or empty appeals to ‘agency’, à la Halliday, are simply obstructions to satisfactorily rethinking the relationship between theory and practice.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To begin, this paper outlines three different senses of postmodernism by examining the writing of Jean‐François Lyotard. It then turns to Friedrich Nietzsche to focus more sharply on two central aspects of postmodern, or better, post‐structuralist, theories: perspectivism and the critique of subjectivity. How these two aspects of post‐structuralism have been utilised in the study of international relations is explained. In particular, the author highlights the epistemological and political implications of post‐structuralism for the study of international relations. Finally the paper concludes by returning to the question of how post‐structuralism re‐evaluates the relationship between theory and practice. It suggests that trite invocations of ‘the real world’ or empty appeals to ‘agency’, à la Halliday, are simply obstructions to satisfactorily rethinking the relationship between theory and practice.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To begin, this paper outlines three different senses of postmodernism by examining the writing of Jean‐François Lyotard. It then turns to Friedrich Nietzsche to focus more sharply on two central aspects of postmodern, or better, post‐structuralist, theories: perspectivism and the critique of subjectivity. How these two aspects of post‐structuralism have been utilised in the study of international relations is explained. In particular, the author highlights the epistemological and political implications of post‐structuralism for the study of international relations. Finally the paper concludes by returning to the question of how post‐structuralism re‐evaluates the relationship between theory and practice. It suggests that trite invocations of ‘the real world’ or empty appeals to ‘agency’, à la Halliday, are simply obstructions to satisfactorily rethinking the relationship between theory and practice.

Key concepts: Postmodernism, Perspectivism, Structuralism (philosophy of science), Epistemology, Post structuralism, Subjectivity, Sociology, Agency (philosophy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Theories, practices and postmodernism in international relations 1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens