2013New Literary HistoryRequires access

Poetry's Media

Thomas H. Ford

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Anglophone modernist poetics set out to construct poems that were things just like the other things of the world. It was a project of recapturing solidity and objectivity for poetry. In consequence, it confronted with new urgency the question of poetry's media: it was forced to clarify what the raw material of a poem actually was. Because English exists in more than one material mode—it is "verbivocovisual"—most poets understood poetry to be a mixed art, and located the poetic principle at the intersection of language's discrete material substrata. This paper examines the answers given to the question of poetry's media by Charles Olson and William Wordsworth—answers framed, in both cases, in atmospheric, respiratory terms. From these two cases it sketches a media history of poetry as an aerial technology involving the transmission of breath. And it asks what implications our contemporary changing climate might have for this tradition of atmospheric poetics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Anglophone modernist poetics set out to construct poems that were things just like the other things of the world. It was a project of recapturing solidity and objectivity for poetry. In consequence, it confronted with new urgency the question of poetry's media: it was forced to clarify what the raw material of a poem actually was. Because English exists in more than one material mode—it is "verbivocovisual"—most poets understood poetry to be a mixed art, and located the poetic principle at the intersection of language's discrete material substrata. This paper examines the answers given to the question of poetry's media by Charles Olson and William Wordsworth—answers framed, in both cases, in atmospheric, respiratory terms. From these two cases it sketches a media history of poetry as an aerial technology involving the transmission of breath. And it asks what implications our contemporary changing climate might have for this tradition of atmospheric poetics.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Anglophone modernist poetics set out to construct poems that were things just like the other things of the world. It was a project of recapturing solidity and objectivity for poetry. In consequence, it confronted with new urgency the question of poetry's media: it was forced to clarify what the raw material of a poem actually was. Because English exists in more than one material mode—it is "verbivocovisual"—most poets understood poetry to be a mixed art, and located the poetic principle at the intersection of language's discrete material substrata. This paper examines the answers given to the question of poetry's media by Charles Olson and William Wordsworth—answers framed, in both cases, in atmospheric, respiratory terms. From these two cases it sketches a media history of poetry as an aerial technology involving the transmission of breath. And it asks what implications our contemporary changing climate might have for this tradition of atmospheric poetics.

Key concepts: Poetry, Literature, Art, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Poetry's Media — Research Paper | ScholarLens