Calculation of profile drag of airfoils at low Mach numbers.
Tuncer Cebeci, A. M. O. Smith
Abstract
Tuncer Cebeci, A. M. O. Smith
Abstract
This paper investigates the accuracy of a particular method for calculating the profile drag of airfoils at low Mach numbers. The method consists of 1) calculation of the pressure distribution by any suitable method, 2) calculation of laminar flow near the nose by Thwaites' method, 3) calculation of transition by Michel's method (if it is not known a priori), 4) calculation of turbulent boundary-layer flow by Head's method, and, finally, 5) calculation of momentum deficiency in the far wake by means of the Squire-Young relation. Profile drag has been calculated by this method for several airfoils at various angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. The effects of transition and airfoil thickness on the profile drag are studied. Comparison of calculated and experimental values show generally good agreement. The rms error based on 88 calculated drag values is 2.7%.
OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper investigates the accuracy of a particular method for calculating the profile drag of airfoils at low Mach numbers. The method consists of 1) calculation of the pressure distribution by any suitable method, 2) calculation of laminar flow near the nose by Thwaites' method, 3) calculation of transition by Michel's method (if it is not known a priori), 4) calculation of turbulent boundary-layer flow by Head's method, and, finally, 5) calculation of momentum deficiency in the far wake by means of the Squire-Young relation. Profile drag has been calculated by this method for several airfoils at various angles of attack and Reynolds numbers. The effects of transition and airfoil thickness on the profile drag are studied. Comparison of calculated and experimental values show generally good agreement. The rms error based on 88 calculated drag values is 2.7%.
Key concepts: Airfoil, Drag divergence Mach number, Drag, Boundary layer, Mach number, Mechanics, Drag coefficient, Reynolds number