1997Journal of Social PolicyRequires access

Sarah Jarvis and Stephen P. Jenkins, Do the Poor Stay Poor? New Evidence about Income Dynamics from the British Household Panel Survey, ESRC Research Centre on Micro-social Change, University of Essex, 1995, 40 pp. £10.00 paper.

Michael Noble

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The fourth dimension – time – has only recently come on to the agenda in Britain in the study of low income and poverty. Yet as Robert Walker states, ‘without taking time into account ... it is impossible to develop policies that successfully tackle the multiple causes of [poverty]’ (Walker, 1994). In the US studies specifically looking at ‘welfare dynamics’ – following ‘welfare’ recipients in and out of benefit – have a much longer history dating back to the early 1980s (Bane and Ellwood, 1983). Tracking those on low income over time requires access to longitudinal studies which contain appropriate income data. In the US, the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID), in particular, goes back to the 1960s. In Britain there was no comparable survey generating longitudinal data until the advent of the British Household Panel Survey with a first wave in 1991.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The fourth dimension – time – has only recently come on to the agenda in Britain in the study of low income and poverty. Yet as Robert Walker states, ‘without taking time into account ... it is impossible to develop policies that successfully tackle the multiple causes of [poverty]’ (Walker, 1994). In the US studies specifically looking at ‘welfare dynamics’ – following ‘welfare’ recipients in and out of benefit – have a much longer history dating back to the early 1980s (Bane and Ellwood, 1983). Tracking those on low income over time requires access to longitudinal studies which contain appropriate income data. In the US, the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID), in particular, goes back to the 1960s. In Britain there was no comparable survey generating longitudinal data until the advent of the British Household Panel Survey with a first wave in 1991.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The fourth dimension – time – has only recently come on to the agenda in Britain in the study of low income and poverty. Yet as Robert Walker states, ‘without taking time into account ... it is impossible to develop policies that successfully tackle the multiple causes of [poverty]’ (Walker, 1994). In the US studies specifically looking at ‘welfare dynamics’ – following ‘welfare’ recipients in and out of benefit – have a much longer history dating back to the early 1980s (Bane and Ellwood, 1983). Tracking those on low income over time requires access to longitudinal studies which contain appropriate income data. In the US, the Panel Study on Income Dynamics (PSID), in particular, goes back to the 1960s. In Britain there was no comparable survey generating longitudinal data until the advent of the British Household Panel Survey with a first wave in 1991.

Key concepts: British Household Panel Survey, Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Poverty, Welfare, Panel data, Demographic economics, Tracking (education), Dimension (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sarah Jarvis and Stephen P. Jenkins, Do the Poor Stay Poor? New Evidence about Income Dynamics from the British Household Panel Survey, ESRC Research Centre on Micro-social Change, University of Essex, 1995, 40 pp. £10.00 paper. — Research Paper | ScholarLens