1989MeteoriticsRequires access

Geochemistry of polymict ureilite EET83309, and a partially‐disruptive impact model for ureilite origin

P. H. Warren, Gregory W. Kallemeyn

Open publisher page 76 citations

Abstract

Abstract— For most elements, polymict ureilite EET83309 shows no significant compositional difference from other ureilites, including ordinary (“monomict”) ureilites. Polymict ureilites appear to be mixtures of a wide variety of ordinary ureilites, with little dilution by “foreign” extra‐ureilitic materials. Thus, they apparently were mixed (i.e., the ureilites in general formed) on a very small number of parent bodies. In one respect, polymict ureilites do stand out. Along with the only other polymict ureilite that has been analyzed for REE (Nilpena), EET83309 has much higher concentrations of light‐middle REE than most ordinary ureilites. Despite these relative enrichments in LREE, polymict ureilites are nearly devoid of basaltic (Al‐rich) material. A basaltic component should have formed along with (and presumably above) the ultramafic ureilites, in any closed‐system differentiation of an originally chondritic asteroid. This scarcity of complementary basaltic materials may be an important clue to ureilite origins. We suggest that ureilites originated as paracumulates (mushy, cumulate‐like, partial melt residues) deep within a primordially‐heated asteroid or asteroids. While still largely molten, the asteroid was severely disrupted, and most of its external basaltic portion was permanently blown away, by impact of a large, C‐rich projectile. This partially‐disruptive impact tended to permeate the paracumulates with C‐rich, noble‐gas‐rich, and 16O‐rich magma derived mainly from shock‐melting of the projectile. After reaccumulation and cooling, the resultant mixtures of cumulus mafic silicates with essentially “foreign” C‐matrix became “monomict” ureilites. Further small impacts produced polymict ureilites as components of a newly‐developed, basalt‐poor megaregolith. The consistently moderate pyroxene/olivine ratios of the ureilites are as expected for partial melt residues, but not for cumulate (sensu stricto) rocks. The final projectile/target mixing ratio tended to be greatest among the more magnesian and pyroxene‐rich portions of the paracumulate, because these portions were lowest in density, and thus concentrated toward the upper surface of the paracumulate layer. As a result, ureilites show correlations among C, Δ17O, and silicate‐core mg. This model appears to reconcile many paradoxical aspects of ureilite composition (primitive, near‐chondritic, except depleted in basalt, diverse Δ17O) and petrography (igneous, cumulate‐like).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract— For most elements, polymict ureilite EET83309 shows no significant compositional difference from other ureilites, including ordinary (“monomict”) ureilites. Polymict ureilites appear to be mixtures of a wide variety of ordinary ureilites, with little dilution by “foreign” extra‐ureilitic materials. Thus, they apparently were mixed (i.e., the ureilites in general formed) on a very small number of parent bodies. In one respect, polymict ureilites do stand out. Along with the only other polymict ureilite that has been analyzed for REE (Nilpena), EET83309 has much higher concentrations of light‐middle REE than most ordinary ureilites. Despite these relative enrichments in LREE, polymict ureilites are nearly devoid of basaltic (Al‐rich) material. A basaltic component should have formed along with (and presumably above) the ultramafic ureilites, in any closed‐system differentiation of an originally chondritic asteroid. This scarcity of complementary basaltic materials may be an important clue to ureilite origins. We suggest that ureilites originated as paracumulates (mushy, cumulate‐like, partial melt residues) deep within a primordially‐heated asteroid or asteroids. While still largely molten, the asteroid was severely disrupted, and most of its external basaltic portion was permanently blown away, by impact of a large, C‐rich projectile. This partially‐disruptive impact tended to permeate the paracumulates with C‐rich, noble‐gas‐rich, and 16O‐rich magma derived mainly from shock‐melting of the projectile. After reaccumulation and cooling, the resultant mixtures of cumulus mafic silicates with essentially “foreign” C‐matrix became “monomict” ureilites. Further small impacts produced polymict ureilites as components of a newly‐developed, basalt‐poor megaregolith. The consistently moderate pyroxene/olivine ratios of the ureilites are as expected for partial melt residues, but not for cumulate (sensu stricto) rocks. The final projectile/target mixing ratio tended to be greatest among the more magnesian and pyroxene‐rich portions of the paracumulate, because these portions were lowest in density, and thus concentrated toward the upper surface of the paracumulate layer. As a result, ureilites show correlations among C, Δ17O, and silicate‐core mg. This model appears to reconcile many paradoxical aspects of ureilite composition (primitive, near‐chondritic, except depleted in basalt, diverse Δ17O) and petrography (igneous, cumulate‐like).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 76 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract— For most elements, polymict ureilite EET83309 shows no significant compositional difference from other ureilites, including ordinary (“monomict”) ureilites. Polymict ureilites appear to be mixtures of a wide variety of ordinary ureilites, with little dilution by “foreign” extra‐ureilitic materials. Thus, they apparently were mixed (i.e., the ureilites in general formed) on a very small number of parent bodies. In one respect, polymict ureilites do stand out. Along with the only other polymict ureilite that has been analyzed for REE (Nilpena), EET83309 has much higher concentrations of light‐middle REE than most ordinary ureilites. Despite these relative enrichments in LREE, polymict ureilites are nearly devoid of basaltic (Al‐rich) material. A basaltic component should have formed along with (and presumably above) the ultramafic ureilites, in any closed‐system differentiation of an originally chondritic asteroid. This scarcity of complementary basaltic materials may be an important clue to ureilite origins. We suggest that ureilites originated as paracumulates (mushy, cumulate‐like, partial melt residues) deep within a primordially‐heated asteroid or asteroids. While still largely molten, the asteroid was severely disrupted, and most of its external basaltic portion was permanently blown away, by impact of a large, C‐rich projectile. This partially‐disruptive impact tended to permeate the paracumulates with C‐rich, noble‐gas‐rich, and 16O‐rich magma derived mainly from shock‐melting of the projectile. After reaccumulation and cooling, the resultant mixtures of cumulus mafic silicates with essentially “foreign” C‐matrix became “monomict” ureilites. Further small impacts produced polymict ureilites as components of a newly‐developed, basalt‐poor megaregolith. The consistently moderate pyroxene/olivine ratios of the ureilites are as expected for partial melt residues, but not for cumulate (sensu stricto) rocks. The final projectile/target mixing ratio tended to be greatest among the more magnesian and pyroxene‐rich portions of the paracumulate, because these portions were lowest in density, and thus concentrated toward the upper surface of the paracumulate layer. As a result, ureilites show correlations among C, Δ17O, and silicate‐core mg. This model appears to reconcile many paradoxical aspects of ureilite composition (primitive, near‐chondritic, except depleted in basalt, diverse Δ17O) and petrography (igneous, cumulate‐like).

Key concepts: Achondrite, Basalt, Geology, Geochemistry, Partial melting, Asteroid, Astrobiology, Petrogenesis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Geochemistry of polymict ureilite EET83309, and a partially‐disruptive impact model for ureilite origin — Research Paper | ScholarLens