1996Pacing and Clinical ElectrophysiologyRequires access

Intrapatient Comparison of Atrial and Ventricular Sensing, Pacing Threshold, and Impedance: Benefits with Steroid‐Eluting Leads

PIER VITTORIO MORACCHINI, MARIA CRISTINA TESORIERI, Mauro Giuliani, Giuseppe Alfano, Francesco De Seta, SILVANA BOSCHI

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

We compared the atrial and ventricular bio-electrical effects relating to pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and pacing energy in each of 58 patients to determine the importance of pacing impedance in safe low energy stimulations. The study was conducted during 4 years of follow-up. Of the 58 patients in our study, 31 were stimulated in both chambers with steroid-eluting leads (Capsure 4503 and 4003) and 27 with platinum electrode catheters (Target Tip 4511 and 4011). The two groups were homogeneous in sex, age, cardiopathy, and reason for implant. At 6 months, the mean impedance values for the Target Tip were: 358 +/- 72 omega for the atrium and 443 +/- 72 omega for the ventricle (P < 0.00002); after 1 year, atrium = 386 +/- 77 omega, ventricle = 439 +/- 42 omega (P < 0.04); at 2 years, atrium = 409 +/- 86 omega, ventricle = 510 +/- 94 omega (P < 0.0001); at 3 years, atrium = 428 +/- 81 omega, ventricle = 494 +/- 67 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 424 +/- 71 omega and ventricle = 501 +/- 69 omega (P < 0.003). The mean impedance value (for the Capsure) was: atrium = 351 +/- 43 omega, ventricle = 431 +/- 81 omega at 6 months (P < 0.03); at 1 year, atrium = 359 +/- 38 omega, ventricle = 446 +/- 83 omega (P < 0.01); at 2 years, atrium = 304 +/- 124 omega, ventricle = 459 +/- 108 omega (P < 0.0003); at 3 years, atrium = 359 +/- 108 omega, ventricle = 461 +/- 89 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 419 +/- 133 omega and ventricle = 515 +/- 75 omega (P < 0.01). In view of the chronic threshold, low energy stimulation was used at follow-up. The mean low energy stimulation values programmed for Target Tip were: atrium = 2.5 V/0.35 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.30 ms; for Capsure, atrium = 2.5 V/0.25 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.25 ms. The mean stimulation energy value was 31% higher in the atrium than in the ventricle with Capsure leads, and 39% higher with Target Tip. Pacing impedance was lower in the atrium than in the ventricle with both leads. Energy consumption in the atrium is significantly greater than in the ventricle with both leads, particularly with Target Tip.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared the atrial and ventricular bio-electrical effects relating to pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and pacing energy in each of 58 patients to determine the importance of pacing impedance in safe low energy stimulations. The study was conducted during 4 years of follow-up. Of the 58 patients in our study, 31 were stimulated in both chambers with steroid-eluting leads (Capsure 4503 and 4003) and 27 with platinum electrode catheters (Target Tip 4511 and 4011). The two groups were homogeneous in sex, age, cardiopathy, and reason for implant. At 6 months, the mean impedance values for the Target Tip were: 358 +/- 72 omega for the atrium and 443 +/- 72 omega for the ventricle (P < 0.00002); after 1 year, atrium = 386 +/- 77 omega, ventricle = 439 +/- 42 omega (P < 0.04); at 2 years, atrium = 409 +/- 86 omega, ventricle = 510 +/- 94 omega (P < 0.0001); at 3 years, atrium = 428 +/- 81 omega, ventricle = 494 +/- 67 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 424 +/- 71 omega and ventricle = 501 +/- 69 omega (P < 0.003). The mean impedance value (for the Capsure) was: atrium = 351 +/- 43 omega, ventricle = 431 +/- 81 omega at 6 months (P < 0.03); at 1 year, atrium = 359 +/- 38 omega, ventricle = 446 +/- 83 omega (P < 0.01); at 2 years, atrium = 304 +/- 124 omega, ventricle = 459 +/- 108 omega (P < 0.0003); at 3 years, atrium = 359 +/- 108 omega, ventricle = 461 +/- 89 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 419 +/- 133 omega and ventricle = 515 +/- 75 omega (P < 0.01). In view of the chronic threshold, low energy stimulation was used at follow-up. The mean low energy stimulation values programmed for Target Tip were: atrium = 2.5 V/0.35 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.30 ms; for Capsure, atrium = 2.5 V/0.25 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.25 ms. The mean stimulation energy value was 31% higher in the atrium than in the ventricle with Capsure leads, and 39% higher with Target Tip. Pacing impedance was lower in the atrium than in the ventricle with both leads. Energy consumption in the atrium is significantly greater than in the ventricle with both leads, particularly with Target Tip.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared the atrial and ventricular bio-electrical effects relating to pacing threshold, pacing impedance, and pacing energy in each of 58 patients to determine the importance of pacing impedance in safe low energy stimulations. The study was conducted during 4 years of follow-up. Of the 58 patients in our study, 31 were stimulated in both chambers with steroid-eluting leads (Capsure 4503 and 4003) and 27 with platinum electrode catheters (Target Tip 4511 and 4011). The two groups were homogeneous in sex, age, cardiopathy, and reason for implant. At 6 months, the mean impedance values for the Target Tip were: 358 +/- 72 omega for the atrium and 443 +/- 72 omega for the ventricle (P < 0.00002); after 1 year, atrium = 386 +/- 77 omega, ventricle = 439 +/- 42 omega (P < 0.04); at 2 years, atrium = 409 +/- 86 omega, ventricle = 510 +/- 94 omega (P < 0.0001); at 3 years, atrium = 428 +/- 81 omega, ventricle = 494 +/- 67 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 424 +/- 71 omega and ventricle = 501 +/- 69 omega (P < 0.003). The mean impedance value (for the Capsure) was: atrium = 351 +/- 43 omega, ventricle = 431 +/- 81 omega at 6 months (P < 0.03); at 1 year, atrium = 359 +/- 38 omega, ventricle = 446 +/- 83 omega (P < 0.01); at 2 years, atrium = 304 +/- 124 omega, ventricle = 459 +/- 108 omega (P < 0.0003); at 3 years, atrium = 359 +/- 108 omega, ventricle = 461 +/- 89 omega (P < 0.02); and at 4 years, atrium = 419 +/- 133 omega and ventricle = 515 +/- 75 omega (P < 0.01). In view of the chronic threshold, low energy stimulation was used at follow-up. The mean low energy stimulation values programmed for Target Tip were: atrium = 2.5 V/0.35 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.30 ms; for Capsure, atrium = 2.5 V/0.25 ms, ventricle = 2.5 V/0.25 ms. The mean stimulation energy value was 31% higher in the atrium than in the ventricle with Capsure leads, and 39% higher with Target Tip. Pacing impedance was lower in the atrium than in the ventricle with both leads. Energy consumption in the atrium is significantly greater than in the ventricle with both leads, particularly with Target Tip.

Key concepts: Ventricle, Medicine, Atrium (architecture), Cardiology, Internal medicine, Left atrium, Atrial fibrillation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Intrapatient Comparison of Atrial and Ventricular Sensing, Pacing Threshold, and Impedance: Benefits with Steroid‐Eluting Leads — Research Paper | ScholarLens