1999Journal of Personality AssessmentRequires access

Psychoanalysis and Projective Testing: A Review of The Interpretation of Psychological Tests

John S. Auerbach

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This article is a review and reassessment of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet's (1968) The Interpretation of Psychological Tests. The book, a distillation of David Rapaport's approach to psychological assessment, is organized around 2 main foci: a discussion from the perspective of psychoanalytic ego psychology of each of the 3 major instruments (i.e., Wechsler intelligence scale, Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test) in Rapaport's testing battery and a demonstration of how a clinician might interpret and integrate the results of each of these instruments with regard to a single case. I discuss the significance of this book, and of Rapaport's psychoanalytic approach to psychological evaluation, for projective assessment today. In addition, I present information regarding the intellectual backgrounds of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet and explain how each of them was influenced by Roy Schafer, who in the 1950s brought Rapaport's ideas about psychoanalytic theory and psychological testing to Yale University.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article is a review and reassessment of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet's (1968) The Interpretation of Psychological Tests. The book, a distillation of David Rapaport's approach to psychological assessment, is organized around 2 main foci: a discussion from the perspective of psychoanalytic ego psychology of each of the 3 major instruments (i.e., Wechsler intelligence scale, Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test) in Rapaport's testing battery and a demonstration of how a clinician might interpret and integrate the results of each of these instruments with regard to a single case. I discuss the significance of this book, and of Rapaport's psychoanalytic approach to psychological evaluation, for projective assessment today. In addition, I present information regarding the intellectual backgrounds of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet and explain how each of them was influenced by Roy Schafer, who in the 1950s brought Rapaport's ideas about psychoanalytic theory and psychological testing to Yale University.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article is a review and reassessment of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet's (1968) The Interpretation of Psychological Tests. The book, a distillation of David Rapaport's approach to psychological assessment, is organized around 2 main foci: a discussion from the perspective of psychoanalytic ego psychology of each of the 3 major instruments (i.e., Wechsler intelligence scale, Rorschach, Thematic Apperception Test) in Rapaport's testing battery and a demonstration of how a clinician might interpret and integrate the results of each of these instruments with regard to a single case. I discuss the significance of this book, and of Rapaport's psychoanalytic approach to psychological evaluation, for projective assessment today. In addition, I present information regarding the intellectual backgrounds of Allison, Blatt, and Zimet and explain how each of them was influenced by Roy Schafer, who in the 1950s brought Rapaport's ideas about psychoanalytic theory and psychological testing to Yale University.

Key concepts: Rorschach test, Projective test, Psychology, Psychoanalytic theory, Psychoanalysis, Interpretation (philosophy), Psychological testing, Test (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Psychoanalysis and Projective Testing: A Review of The Interpretation of Psychological Tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens