1980CancerOpen access

Function of lymphocyte subpopulations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Activity in the allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction

Jeffrey A. Wolos, Frederick R. Davey

Open full text 25 citations

Abstract

Lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and from normal age-matched controls were evaluated for their ability to participate in allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR). Unfractionated and T enriched lymphocyte populations from normal age-matched controls responded well to allogeneic stimulation. T enriched lymphocytes from patients will CLL also responded to allogeneic lymphocytes. B enriched lymphocytes from normal age-matched individuals produced a stronger stimulus in the allogeneic MLR than did unfractionated mononuclear cell populations. Unfractionated and B enriched lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with CLL were poor stimulators in the allogeneic MLR. In normal age-matched controls T enriched lymphocyte subpopulations were able to respond to autologous B enriched lymphocytes. Autologous mixed lymphocyte cultures from patients with CLL failed to demonstrate any activity.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and from normal age-matched controls were evaluated for their ability to participate in allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR). Unfractionated and T enriched lymphocyte populations from normal age-matched controls responded well to allogeneic stimulation. T enriched lymphocytes from patients will CLL also responded to allogeneic lymphocytes. B enriched lymphocytes from normal age-matched individuals produced a stronger stimulus in the allogeneic MLR than did unfractionated mononuclear cell populations. Unfractionated and B enriched lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with CLL were poor stimulators in the allogeneic MLR. In normal age-matched controls T enriched lymphocyte subpopulations were able to respond to autologous B enriched lymphocytes. Autologous mixed lymphocyte cultures from patients with CLL failed to demonstrate any activity.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and from normal age-matched controls were evaluated for their ability to participate in allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reactions (MLR). Unfractionated and T enriched lymphocyte populations from normal age-matched controls responded well to allogeneic stimulation. T enriched lymphocytes from patients will CLL also responded to allogeneic lymphocytes. B enriched lymphocytes from normal age-matched individuals produced a stronger stimulus in the allogeneic MLR than did unfractionated mononuclear cell populations. Unfractionated and B enriched lymphocyte subpopulations from patients with CLL were poor stimulators in the allogeneic MLR. In normal age-matched controls T enriched lymphocyte subpopulations were able to respond to autologous B enriched lymphocytes. Autologous mixed lymphocyte cultures from patients with CLL failed to demonstrate any activity.

Key concepts: Medicine, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Mixed lymphocyte reaction, Lymphocyte, Immunology, Lymphocyte activation, Leukemia, Immune system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Function of lymphocyte subpopulations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Activity in the allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction — Research Paper | ScholarLens