1983The Journal of PsychologyRequires access

Attribution of Success and Failure in College Performance

Betsy Q. Griffin, Allan Combs, Michael Land, Natalie Combs

Open publisher page 15 citations

Abstract

Summary Previous findings attributing academic achievement to traditional causes were replicated and extended to nontraditional causes in two experiments. In the first, 74 female and 40 male students in introductory level courses evaluated their course performance and made causal attributions for their achievement. In addition to the four traditional causes of achievement—ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck—attributions were made to the teacher's performance, interest in the course, and past training. Successful students made higher attributions than unsuccessful students to teacher's performance, effort, ability, and interest. The second experiment, in which 37 advanced math students made attributions for their course achievement, replicated the effects of success on attributions to effort and ability.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summary Previous findings attributing academic achievement to traditional causes were replicated and extended to nontraditional causes in two experiments. In the first, 74 female and 40 male students in introductory level courses evaluated their course performance and made causal attributions for their achievement. In addition to the four traditional causes of achievement—ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck—attributions were made to the teacher's performance, interest in the course, and past training. Successful students made higher attributions than unsuccessful students to teacher's performance, effort, ability, and interest. The second experiment, in which 37 advanced math students made attributions for their course achievement, replicated the effects of success on attributions to effort and ability.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 15 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summary Previous findings attributing academic achievement to traditional causes were replicated and extended to nontraditional causes in two experiments. In the first, 74 female and 40 male students in introductory level courses evaluated their course performance and made causal attributions for their achievement. In addition to the four traditional causes of achievement—ability, effort, task difficulty, and luck—attributions were made to the teacher's performance, interest in the course, and past training. Successful students made higher attributions than unsuccessful students to teacher's performance, effort, ability, and interest. The second experiment, in which 37 advanced math students made attributions for their course achievement, replicated the effects of success on attributions to effort and ability.

Key concepts: Attribution, Luck, Psychology, Academic achievement, Task (project management), Social psychology, Need for achievement, Mathematics education

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Attribution of Success and Failure in College Performance — Research Paper | ScholarLens