1931JAMARequires access

ACUTE LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA AND INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS

Charles F. Ulrich

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

It is our purpose at this time to report a fatal case of acute lymphatic leukemia, and another nonfatal case, in which a diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis was made. These cases are being reported for the purpose of comparison; hence a brief analysis of the clinical course, together with the morphology of the blood in both, should not be devoid of interest. The differential diagnosis should, ordinarily, not be difficult. However, confusion frequently occurs between acute leukemia and infectious mononucleosis. A correct diagnosis will usually be made if the patient is kept under observation for a period of time, and by repeated study of stained blood smears. The occurrence of acute leukemia with remissions renders a correct diagnosis extremely difficult. One not infrequently encounters atypical cases of idiopathic purpura, as well as agranulocytic angina, presenting blood pictures, clinical symptoms, and objective evidence that are strikingly similar, and leading one to

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is our purpose at this time to report a fatal case of acute lymphatic leukemia, and another nonfatal case, in which a diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis was made. These cases are being reported for the purpose of comparison; hence a brief analysis of the clinical course, together with the morphology of the blood in both, should not be devoid of interest. The differential diagnosis should, ordinarily, not be difficult. However, confusion frequently occurs between acute leukemia and infectious mononucleosis. A correct diagnosis will usually be made if the patient is kept under observation for a period of time, and by repeated study of stained blood smears. The occurrence of acute leukemia with remissions renders a correct diagnosis extremely difficult. One not infrequently encounters atypical cases of idiopathic purpura, as well as agranulocytic angina, presenting blood pictures, clinical symptoms, and objective evidence that are strikingly similar, and leading one to

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is our purpose at this time to report a fatal case of acute lymphatic leukemia, and another nonfatal case, in which a diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis was made. These cases are being reported for the purpose of comparison; hence a brief analysis of the clinical course, together with the morphology of the blood in both, should not be devoid of interest. The differential diagnosis should, ordinarily, not be difficult. However, confusion frequently occurs between acute leukemia and infectious mononucleosis. A correct diagnosis will usually be made if the patient is kept under observation for a period of time, and by repeated study of stained blood smears. The occurrence of acute leukemia with remissions renders a correct diagnosis extremely difficult. One not infrequently encounters atypical cases of idiopathic purpura, as well as agranulocytic angina, presenting blood pictures, clinical symptoms, and objective evidence that are strikingly similar, and leading one to

Key concepts: Mononucleosis, Medicine, Confusion, Acute leukemia, Lymphatic leukemia, Leukemia, Differential diagnosis, Thrombocytopenic purpura

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ACUTE LYMPHATIC LEUKEMIA AND INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS — Research Paper | ScholarLens