PURPA: The Intersection of Competition and Regulatory Policy
Hon. Richard D. Cudahy
Abstract
Hon. Richard D. Cudahy
Abstract
As Congress was gearing up for a possible repeal of section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, critics of PURPA agreed that the statute was incongruent with the push for a more competitive marketplace in electric power generation. Despite critics’ desire for radical change, PURPA and its underlying values, remain valid and continue to deserve support. Principally among these values is a concern for the ethics of energy generation: energy conservation and fuel diversity. Left to a deregulated, competitive market, these timely and important values would be lost to the ever important value of the dollar.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As Congress was gearing up for a possible repeal of section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, critics of PURPA agreed that the statute was incongruent with the push for a more competitive marketplace in electric power generation. Despite critics’ desire for radical change, PURPA and its underlying values, remain valid and continue to deserve support. Principally among these values is a concern for the ethics of energy generation: energy conservation and fuel diversity. Left to a deregulated, competitive market, these timely and important values would be lost to the ever important value of the dollar.
Key concepts: Repeal, Statute, Liberian dollar, Competition (biology), Value (mathematics), Diversity (politics), Business, Economics