Fischer‐Tropsch Catalysts for the Biomass‐to‐Liquid (BTL)‐Process
Eric van Steen, Michael Claeys
Abstract
Open-access reader
Eric van Steen, Michael Claeys
Abstract
Open-access reader
Abstract The Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis is at the heart of the Biomass‐to‐Liquids (BTL) process. Feasibility studies published in open literature typically consider cobalt‐based catalysts for the Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis. Here, we present an overview on the history and development up until the present for both cobalt‐ and iron‐based Fischer‐Tropsch catalysts. The role of the support material and various other additives to the catalyst formulation are discussed in detail with regard to activity, catalyst deactivation, and selectivity. Tentative explanations for e.g. the observed size dependency in cobalt‐based catalysts and phase transformations in iron‐based Fischer‐Tropsch catalysts are offered. The productivity of cobalt‐based catalysts at high conversion level is currently higher than that of iron‐based catalysts. Nevertheless, it is argued that iron‐based catalysts may be an attractive option for the BTL‐process, since it is much cheaper, impacting on the cost of the process due to inevitable process set‐ups in industrial operation. Improvement of current iron‐based catalysts is however desired.
OpenAlex reports 356 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract The Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis is at the heart of the Biomass‐to‐Liquids (BTL) process. Feasibility studies published in open literature typically consider cobalt‐based catalysts for the Fischer‐Tropsch synthesis. Here, we present an overview on the history and development up until the present for both cobalt‐ and iron‐based Fischer‐Tropsch catalysts. The role of the support material and various other additives to the catalyst formulation are discussed in detail with regard to activity, catalyst deactivation, and selectivity. Tentative explanations for e.g. the observed size dependency in cobalt‐based catalysts and phase transformations in iron‐based Fischer‐Tropsch catalysts are offered. The productivity of cobalt‐based catalysts at high conversion level is currently higher than that of iron‐based catalysts. Nevertheless, it is argued that iron‐based catalysts may be an attractive option for the BTL‐process, since it is much cheaper, impacting on the cost of the process due to inevitable process set‐ups in industrial operation. Improvement of current iron‐based catalysts is however desired.
Key concepts: Fischer–Tropsch process, Catalysis, Cobalt, Syngas, Chemistry, Process (computing), Biomass (ecology), Chemical engineering