1981The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaOpen access

Selective adaptation of VOT in Polish

William F. Ganong, Patricia Keating

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

In order to test the hypothesis that selective adaptation and range effects in speech perception are produced by the same proccesses, we compared the size of range effects and adaptation effects for monolingual Polish and English subjects. Previous work has indicated that Polish speakers show much larger range effects in phonetic categorization of VOT than do English speakers. We therefore tested the adaptation effect of a +70 ms VOT stimulus on the perception of two apical VOT continua (ranging from −70 to +30 and −30 to +70 ms VOT). Eight monolingual Polish and English subjects participated. As in our previous work, Poles showed large range effects in categorizing VOT stimuli. (Their mean boundaries were at −3.4 vs 8.4 ms VOT.) They also showed substantial selective adaptation boundary shifts (mean = 18.2 ms), which were reliably larger than the adaptation effects shown by the English speakers (mean = 7.6 ms). Thus, the Polish speakers' perception of VOT is more sensitive than English speakers' to both selective adaptation and range effects, as a unitary model for adaptation and range effects would predict.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to test the hypothesis that selective adaptation and range effects in speech perception are produced by the same proccesses, we compared the size of range effects and adaptation effects for monolingual Polish and English subjects. Previous work has indicated that Polish speakers show much larger range effects in phonetic categorization of VOT than do English speakers. We therefore tested the adaptation effect of a +70 ms VOT stimulus on the perception of two apical VOT continua (ranging from −70 to +30 and −30 to +70 ms VOT). Eight monolingual Polish and English subjects participated. As in our previous work, Poles showed large range effects in categorizing VOT stimuli. (Their mean boundaries were at −3.4 vs 8.4 ms VOT.) They also showed substantial selective adaptation boundary shifts (mean = 18.2 ms), which were reliably larger than the adaptation effects shown by the English speakers (mean = 7.6 ms). Thus, the Polish speakers' perception of VOT is more sensitive than English speakers' to both selective adaptation and range effects, as a unitary model for adaptation and range effects would predict.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to test the hypothesis that selective adaptation and range effects in speech perception are produced by the same proccesses, we compared the size of range effects and adaptation effects for monolingual Polish and English subjects. Previous work has indicated that Polish speakers show much larger range effects in phonetic categorization of VOT than do English speakers. We therefore tested the adaptation effect of a +70 ms VOT stimulus on the perception of two apical VOT continua (ranging from −70 to +30 and −30 to +70 ms VOT). Eight monolingual Polish and English subjects participated. As in our previous work, Poles showed large range effects in categorizing VOT stimuli. (Their mean boundaries were at −3.4 vs 8.4 ms VOT.) They also showed substantial selective adaptation boundary shifts (mean = 18.2 ms), which were reliably larger than the adaptation effects shown by the English speakers (mean = 7.6 ms). Thus, the Polish speakers' perception of VOT is more sensitive than English speakers' to both selective adaptation and range effects, as a unitary model for adaptation and range effects would predict.

Key concepts: Voice-onset time, Categorization, Perception, Adaptation (eye), Audiology, Psychology, Stimulus (psychology), Linguistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selective adaptation of VOT in Polish — Research Paper | ScholarLens