2008European NeurologyRequires access

Inhibition of Decarboxylase and Levels of Dopa and 3-O-Methyldopa: A Comparative Study of Benserazide versus Carbidopa in Rodents and of Madopar Standard versus Madopar HBS in Volunteers

M. Da Prada, R. Kettler, G. Zürcher, R. Schaffner, W. Haefely

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

The combinations of benserazide and levodopa (1:4, Madopar) and of carbidopa and levodopa (1:10 and 1:4, Sinemet) are currently the most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease. In the present comparative study some effects of the peripheral aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors benserazide and carbidopa administered alone or in combination with levodopa by the oral route were investigated in two animal species (rat and mouse) and in healthy volunteers. Benserazide is about 10 times more potent than carbidopa as inhibitor of peripheral AADC both in animals and man. Even at relatively high doses (up to 60 mumol/kg p.o.) benserazide is shown in animals to inhibit the decarboxylation of levodopa only in the extracerebral tissues, thus permitting the formation of dopamine in the striatum and in the hypothalamus. As benserazide is the most potent peripheral AADC inhibitor presently available, is well tolerated and relatively nontoxic even when used chronically, it appears to be the peripheral AADC inhibitor of choice for the development of controlled-release formulations in which Dopa is combined with a peripheral AADC inhibitor. When administered to healthy subjects the pharmacokinetics of the new drug delivery system named Madopar HBS (hydrodynamically balanced system) was characterized by lower and delayed plasma peak concentrations but a longer-lasting concentration of Dopa than after Madopar standard. Therefore, this new controlled-release system may reduce the clinical fluctuations occurring in patients with 'wearing-off' and 'on-off' phenomena.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The combinations of benserazide and levodopa (1:4, Madopar) and of carbidopa and levodopa (1:10 and 1:4, Sinemet) are currently the most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease. In the present comparative study some effects of the peripheral aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors benserazide and carbidopa administered alone or in combination with levodopa by the oral route were investigated in two animal species (rat and mouse) and in healthy volunteers. Benserazide is about 10 times more potent than carbidopa as inhibitor of peripheral AADC both in animals and man. Even at relatively high doses (up to 60 mumol/kg p.o.) benserazide is shown in animals to inhibit the decarboxylation of levodopa only in the extracerebral tissues, thus permitting the formation of dopamine in the striatum and in the hypothalamus. As benserazide is the most potent peripheral AADC inhibitor presently available, is well tolerated and relatively nontoxic even when used chronically, it appears to be the peripheral AADC inhibitor of choice for the development of controlled-release formulations in which Dopa is combined with a peripheral AADC inhibitor. When administered to healthy subjects the pharmacokinetics of the new drug delivery system named Madopar HBS (hydrodynamically balanced system) was characterized by lower and delayed plasma peak concentrations but a longer-lasting concentration of Dopa than after Madopar standard. Therefore, this new controlled-release system may reduce the clinical fluctuations occurring in patients with 'wearing-off' and 'on-off' phenomena.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The combinations of benserazide and levodopa (1:4, Madopar) and of carbidopa and levodopa (1:10 and 1:4, Sinemet) are currently the most effective treatment of Parkinson's disease. In the present comparative study some effects of the peripheral aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors benserazide and carbidopa administered alone or in combination with levodopa by the oral route were investigated in two animal species (rat and mouse) and in healthy volunteers. Benserazide is about 10 times more potent than carbidopa as inhibitor of peripheral AADC both in animals and man. Even at relatively high doses (up to 60 mumol/kg p.o.) benserazide is shown in animals to inhibit the decarboxylation of levodopa only in the extracerebral tissues, thus permitting the formation of dopamine in the striatum and in the hypothalamus. As benserazide is the most potent peripheral AADC inhibitor presently available, is well tolerated and relatively nontoxic even when used chronically, it appears to be the peripheral AADC inhibitor of choice for the development of controlled-release formulations in which Dopa is combined with a peripheral AADC inhibitor. When administered to healthy subjects the pharmacokinetics of the new drug delivery system named Madopar HBS (hydrodynamically balanced system) was characterized by lower and delayed plasma peak concentrations but a longer-lasting concentration of Dopa than after Madopar standard. Therefore, this new controlled-release system may reduce the clinical fluctuations occurring in patients with 'wearing-off' and 'on-off' phenomena.

Key concepts: Benserazide, Carbidopa, Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase, Levodopa, Pharmacology, Decarboxylase inhibitor, Pharmacokinetics, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Inhibition of Decarboxylase and Levels of Dopa and 3-O-Methyldopa: A Comparative Study of Benserazide versus Carbidopa in Rodents and of Madopar Standard versus Madopar HBS in Volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens