C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels Do Not Reflect Disease Status in Patients with Multiple Myeloma
Ross Duncan Brown, Leonie Snowdon, Elaine Uhr, John Gibson, Daniel Joshua
Abstract
Ross Duncan Brown, Leonie Snowdon, Elaine Uhr, John Gibson, Daniel Joshua
Abstract
It has recently been suggested that a combination of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and beta-2-microglobulin (beta 2M) can be used to devise a simple prognostic model for patients with multiple myeloma. In this study we have measured serum beta 2M, CRP and thymidine kinase (STK) in a series of 215 samples to determine their value as a monitor of disease status. A longitudinal study was also performed with 6 individual patients. CRP levels did not correlate with disease status. The mean of the stable (23.62 mg/L) and the progressive disease 23.64 mg/L) groups were almost identical (t = 0.003; p = NS) with ranges of < 5-150 mg/L and < 5-100 mg/L respectively. There was no correlation between CRP and STK (r = 0.11) or CRP and beta 2M (r = 0.05). In longitudinal studies, CRP did not necessarily reflect changes in disease activity. We conclude that CRP measurements are not valuable as a monitor of disease activity in patients with myeloma.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
It has recently been suggested that a combination of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and beta-2-microglobulin (beta 2M) can be used to devise a simple prognostic model for patients with multiple myeloma. In this study we have measured serum beta 2M, CRP and thymidine kinase (STK) in a series of 215 samples to determine their value as a monitor of disease status. A longitudinal study was also performed with 6 individual patients. CRP levels did not correlate with disease status. The mean of the stable (23.62 mg/L) and the progressive disease 23.64 mg/L) groups were almost identical (t = 0.003; p = NS) with ranges of < 5-150 mg/L and < 5-100 mg/L respectively. There was no correlation between CRP and STK (r = 0.11) or CRP and beta 2M (r = 0.05). In longitudinal studies, CRP did not necessarily reflect changes in disease activity. We conclude that CRP measurements are not valuable as a monitor of disease activity in patients with myeloma.
Key concepts: Multiple myeloma, C-reactive protein, Internal medicine, Medicine, Beta-2 microglobulin, Gastroenterology, Disease, Oncology