1988The Elementary School JournalRequires access

Twelve Middle-School Teachers' Planning

Deborah Brown

Open publisher page 87 citations

Abstract

Case-study descriptions were made of 12 middle-school teachers' instructional yearly, unit, weekly, and daily planning on the basis of a background questionnaire, interview protocols, an analysis of written plans, think-aloud typescripts, and a questionnaire. The middle-school teachers, like elementary teachers, used a pattern of "nested" decision making in instructional planning, but unlike elementary teachers, did not engage in term planning. Instead of the rational model, Yinger's 3-stage process model provides a better description of yearly, unit, and weekly planning because teachers focused on activities rather than on objectives. At the daily level, Leinhardt's agenda-formulation model provides a closer fit than the rational model. Teachers made planning decisions on the basis of what had worked for them in the past, the school schedule, the availability of instructional materials, and the interests and abilities of students.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Case-study descriptions were made of 12 middle-school teachers' instructional yearly, unit, weekly, and daily planning on the basis of a background questionnaire, interview protocols, an analysis of written plans, think-aloud typescripts, and a questionnaire. The middle-school teachers, like elementary teachers, used a pattern of "nested" decision making in instructional planning, but unlike elementary teachers, did not engage in term planning. Instead of the rational model, Yinger's 3-stage process model provides a better description of yearly, unit, and weekly planning because teachers focused on activities rather than on objectives. At the daily level, Leinhardt's agenda-formulation model provides a closer fit than the rational model. Teachers made planning decisions on the basis of what had worked for them in the past, the school schedule, the availability of instructional materials, and the interests and abilities of students.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 87 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Case-study descriptions were made of 12 middle-school teachers' instructional yearly, unit, weekly, and daily planning on the basis of a background questionnaire, interview protocols, an analysis of written plans, think-aloud typescripts, and a questionnaire. The middle-school teachers, like elementary teachers, used a pattern of "nested" decision making in instructional planning, but unlike elementary teachers, did not engage in term planning. Instead of the rational model, Yinger's 3-stage process model provides a better description of yearly, unit, and weekly planning because teachers focused on activities rather than on objectives. At the daily level, Leinhardt's agenda-formulation model provides a closer fit than the rational model. Teachers made planning decisions on the basis of what had worked for them in the past, the school schedule, the availability of instructional materials, and the interests and abilities of students.

Key concepts: Mathematics education, Schedule, Psychology, Rational planning model, Unit (ring theory), Instructional development, Middle level, School teachers

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Twelve Middle-School Teachers' Planning — Research Paper | ScholarLens