1997•Experimental and Clinical PsychopharmacologyRequires access

(R)-methanandamide, but not anadamide, substitutes for Δ-9-THC in a drug-discrimination procedure.

Robert T. Burkey, Jack R. Nation

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

Fourteen male rats were trained to discriminate between injections of 2 mg/kg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) and vehicle in a 2-lever operant drug-discrimination paradigm. Following training, substitution tests using a cumulative dosing procedure revealed that anandamide (0.5-16 mg/kg ip), the putative endogenous camabinoid receptor ligand, failed to generalize to the discriminative stimulus properties of the training dose of delta 9-THC. However, dose-dependent generalization to the delta 9-THC cue was observed following administration of both CP-55,940 (0.05-0.8 mg/kg ip), a synthetic cannabinoid, and (R)-methanandamide (0.5-8 mg/kg ip), a metabolically stable analog of anandamide. Collectively, these results demonstrate a cannabinoid-specific in vivo effect of an anandamide compound and suggest that the naturally occurring form of anandamide may be metabolized too rapidly to produce a cannabimimetic intercceptive state when administered peripherally.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fourteen male rats were trained to discriminate between injections of 2 mg/kg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) and vehicle in a 2-lever operant drug-discrimination paradigm. Following training, substitution tests using a cumulative dosing procedure revealed that anandamide (0.5-16 mg/kg ip), the putative endogenous camabinoid receptor ligand, failed to generalize to the discriminative stimulus properties of the training dose of delta 9-THC. However, dose-dependent generalization to the delta 9-THC cue was observed following administration of both CP-55,940 (0.05-0.8 mg/kg ip), a synthetic cannabinoid, and (R)-methanandamide (0.5-8 mg/kg ip), a metabolically stable analog of anandamide. Collectively, these results demonstrate a cannabinoid-specific in vivo effect of an anandamide compound and suggest that the naturally occurring form of anandamide may be metabolized too rapidly to produce a cannabimimetic intercceptive state when administered peripherally.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fourteen male rats were trained to discriminate between injections of 2 mg/kg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) and vehicle in a 2-lever operant drug-discrimination paradigm. Following training, substitution tests using a cumulative dosing procedure revealed that anandamide (0.5-16 mg/kg ip), the putative endogenous camabinoid receptor ligand, failed to generalize to the discriminative stimulus properties of the training dose of delta 9-THC. However, dose-dependent generalization to the delta 9-THC cue was observed following administration of both CP-55,940 (0.05-0.8 mg/kg ip), a synthetic cannabinoid, and (R)-methanandamide (0.5-8 mg/kg ip), a metabolically stable analog of anandamide. Collectively, these results demonstrate a cannabinoid-specific in vivo effect of an anandamide compound and suggest that the naturally occurring form of anandamide may be metabolized too rapidly to produce a cannabimimetic intercceptive state when administered peripherally.

Key concepts: Anandamide, Cannabinoid, Pharmacology, Cannabinoid receptor, Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, Chemistry, Stimulus control, Endocannabinoid system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
(R)-methanandamide, but not anadamide, substitutes for Δ-9-THC in a drug-discrimination procedure. — Research Paper | ScholarLens