2008The Chinese Historical ReviewRequires access

Retrospect and Prospect: The Rise of Economic History in China

Bozhong Li

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The recently concluded twentieth century has witnessed the rise of economic history as a discipline in China. During this century, the discipline has gone through the stages of inception, formation, transformation, and renaissance. At present it is facing unprecedented challenges. In this paper I will review the evolution of the discipline and analyze the major characteristics of the discipline in accordance with these four stages. Finally I will discuss the probable future of the discipline in the twenty-first century. First I would like to explain briefly the meaning of “economic history” as it is understood in Chinese academic circles. In China, throughout most of the twentieth century “economic history” included both social history and economic history. For this reason, the terms “economic history,” “social history” and “socioeconomic history” were often used interchangeably, particularly in the earlier periods. Only since the late 1980s has some sort of differentiation appeared and more specialized social history and economic history have emerged. Even so, the majority of Chinese scholars still have been working in the paradigm of socioeconomic history, similar, in some respects, with the “economic and social history” which has risen in the West since the 1960s. In sum, in this paper “economic history” refers to “socio-economic history,” not “economic history” in a strict sense.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recently concluded twentieth century has witnessed the rise of economic history as a discipline in China. During this century, the discipline has gone through the stages of inception, formation, transformation, and renaissance. At present it is facing unprecedented challenges. In this paper I will review the evolution of the discipline and analyze the major characteristics of the discipline in accordance with these four stages. Finally I will discuss the probable future of the discipline in the twenty-first century. First I would like to explain briefly the meaning of “economic history” as it is understood in Chinese academic circles. In China, throughout most of the twentieth century “economic history” included both social history and economic history. For this reason, the terms “economic history,” “social history” and “socioeconomic history” were often used interchangeably, particularly in the earlier periods. Only since the late 1980s has some sort of differentiation appeared and more specialized social history and economic history have emerged. Even so, the majority of Chinese scholars still have been working in the paradigm of socioeconomic history, similar, in some respects, with the “economic and social history” which has risen in the West since the 1960s. In sum, in this paper “economic history” refers to “socio-economic history,” not “economic history” in a strict sense.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recently concluded twentieth century has witnessed the rise of economic history as a discipline in China. During this century, the discipline has gone through the stages of inception, formation, transformation, and renaissance. At present it is facing unprecedented challenges. In this paper I will review the evolution of the discipline and analyze the major characteristics of the discipline in accordance with these four stages. Finally I will discuss the probable future of the discipline in the twenty-first century. First I would like to explain briefly the meaning of “economic history” as it is understood in Chinese academic circles. In China, throughout most of the twentieth century “economic history” included both social history and economic history. For this reason, the terms “economic history,” “social history” and “socioeconomic history” were often used interchangeably, particularly in the earlier periods. Only since the late 1980s has some sort of differentiation appeared and more specialized social history and economic history have emerged. Even so, the majority of Chinese scholars still have been working in the paradigm of socioeconomic history, similar, in some respects, with the “economic and social history” which has risen in the West since the 1960s. In sum, in this paper “economic history” refers to “socio-economic history,” not “economic history” in a strict sense.

Key concepts: China, Economics, Natural resource economics, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retrospect and Prospect: The Rise of Economic History in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens