Implications of Item Response Theory for the Measurement Practitioner
Brenda H. Loyd
Abstract
Brenda H. Loyd
Abstract
Over the past several years, item response theory (IRT) has had a dramatic impact on the field of educational measurement. At the theoretical level and for educational researchers, it has shown itself to have certain advantages over classical theory both in terms of the research questions it can address and in terms of the applications it can support. For these benefits to be realized by the measurement practitioner, however, two major difficulties must be confronted: (a) the enormous complexity of IRT theory and procedures and (b) the lack of robustness of IRT procedures to violation of assumptions.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Over the past several years, item response theory (IRT) has had a dramatic impact on the field of educational measurement. At the theoretical level and for educational researchers, it has shown itself to have certain advantages over classical theory both in terms of the research questions it can address and in terms of the applications it can support. For these benefits to be realized by the measurement practitioner, however, two major difficulties must be confronted: (a) the enormous complexity of IRT theory and procedures and (b) the lack of robustness of IRT procedures to violation of assumptions.
Key concepts: Item response theory, Robustness (evolution), Educational testing, Psychology, Test theory, Field (mathematics), Econometrics, Classical test theory