1988•Applied Measurement in EducationRequires access

Implications of Item Response Theory for the Measurement Practitioner

Brenda H. Loyd

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Over the past several years, item response theory (IRT) has had a dramatic impact on the field of educational measurement. At the theoretical level and for educational researchers, it has shown itself to have certain advantages over classical theory both in terms of the research questions it can address and in terms of the applications it can support. For these benefits to be realized by the measurement practitioner, however, two major difficulties must be confronted: (a) the enormous complexity of IRT theory and procedures and (b) the lack of robustness of IRT procedures to violation of assumptions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Over the past several years, item response theory (IRT) has had a dramatic impact on the field of educational measurement. At the theoretical level and for educational researchers, it has shown itself to have certain advantages over classical theory both in terms of the research questions it can address and in terms of the applications it can support. For these benefits to be realized by the measurement practitioner, however, two major difficulties must be confronted: (a) the enormous complexity of IRT theory and procedures and (b) the lack of robustness of IRT procedures to violation of assumptions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Over the past several years, item response theory (IRT) has had a dramatic impact on the field of educational measurement. At the theoretical level and for educational researchers, it has shown itself to have certain advantages over classical theory both in terms of the research questions it can address and in terms of the applications it can support. For these benefits to be realized by the measurement practitioner, however, two major difficulties must be confronted: (a) the enormous complexity of IRT theory and procedures and (b) the lack of robustness of IRT procedures to violation of assumptions.

Key concepts: Item response theory, Robustness (evolution), Educational testing, Psychology, Test theory, Field (mathematics), Econometrics, Classical test theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implications of Item Response Theory for the Measurement Practitioner — Research Paper | ScholarLens