On the role of Cro in λ prophage induction
Sine Lo Svenningsen, Nina Costantino, Donald L. Court, Sankar L Adhya
Abstract
Open-access reader
Sine Lo Svenningsen, Nina Costantino, Donald L. Court, Sankar L Adhya
Abstract
Open-access reader
The lysogenic state of bacteriophage lambda is exceptionally stable yet the prophage is readily induced in response to DNA damage. This delicate epigenetic switch is believed to be regulated by two proteins; the lysogenic maintenance promoting protein CI and the early lytic protein Cro. First, we confirm, in the native configuration, the previous observation that the DNA loop mediated by oligomerization of CI bound to two distinct operator regions (O(L) and O(R)), increases repression of the early lytic promoters and is important for stable maintenance of lysogeny. Second, we show that the presence of the cro gene might be unimportant for the lysogenic to lytic switch during induction of the lambda prophage. We revisit the idea that Cro's primary role in induction is instead to mediate weak repression of the early lytic promoters.
OpenAlex reports 101 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The lysogenic state of bacteriophage lambda is exceptionally stable yet the prophage is readily induced in response to DNA damage. This delicate epigenetic switch is believed to be regulated by two proteins; the lysogenic maintenance promoting protein CI and the early lytic protein Cro. First, we confirm, in the native configuration, the previous observation that the DNA loop mediated by oligomerization of CI bound to two distinct operator regions (O(L) and O(R)), increases repression of the early lytic promoters and is important for stable maintenance of lysogeny. Second, we show that the presence of the cro gene might be unimportant for the lysogenic to lytic switch during induction of the lambda prophage. We revisit the idea that Cro's primary role in induction is instead to mediate weak repression of the early lytic promoters.
Key concepts: Lysogenic cycle, Prophage, Lytic cycle, Psychological repression, Bacteriophage, Biology, Genetics, SOS response