2005•Rethinking MarxismRequires access

The “Quantitative Approach” to the Marxian Concept of Value

Kepa Ormazabal

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper is concerned with what I call the “quantitative approach” to the “transformation problem” of chapter 9 of volume 3 of capital, very widespread in the literature. I call it so because it conceives the “transformation of value into competitive price” as a relationship between quantities of labor-value and quantities of money price. Such a conception of the transformation of value into competitive price presupposes that value has quantitative determination. My central contention in this paper is that this presupposition contradicts Marx's idea that labor is the substance or immanent measure of value. In Marx, labor cannot be money, which means that value as such does not have a quantitative determination apart from price expressed in some product of labor. Accordingly, there are no such things as “labor-values” and the transformation of value into competitive price does not contradict the determination of value by labor or Marx's “law of exchange”: it is the process through which labor-value becomes objectified as money price in such a way as to equalize the profit rate of capitals of a nonuniform composition. With the “transformation” of value into competitive price, Marx refutes Ricardo's refutation of the labor theory of value in principles (chap. 1, sec. 4).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper is concerned with what I call the “quantitative approach” to the “transformation problem” of chapter 9 of volume 3 of capital, very widespread in the literature. I call it so because it conceives the “transformation of value into competitive price” as a relationship between quantities of labor-value and quantities of money price. Such a conception of the transformation of value into competitive price presupposes that value has quantitative determination. My central contention in this paper is that this presupposition contradicts Marx's idea that labor is the substance or immanent measure of value. In Marx, labor cannot be money, which means that value as such does not have a quantitative determination apart from price expressed in some product of labor. Accordingly, there are no such things as “labor-values” and the transformation of value into competitive price does not contradict the determination of value by labor or Marx's “law of exchange”: it is the process through which labor-value becomes objectified as money price in such a way as to equalize the profit rate of capitals of a nonuniform composition. With the “transformation” of value into competitive price, Marx refutes Ricardo's refutation of the labor theory of value in principles (chap. 1, sec. 4).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper is concerned with what I call the “quantitative approach” to the “transformation problem” of chapter 9 of volume 3 of capital, very widespread in the literature. I call it so because it conceives the “transformation of value into competitive price” as a relationship between quantities of labor-value and quantities of money price. Such a conception of the transformation of value into competitive price presupposes that value has quantitative determination. My central contention in this paper is that this presupposition contradicts Marx's idea that labor is the substance or immanent measure of value. In Marx, labor cannot be money, which means that value as such does not have a quantitative determination apart from price expressed in some product of labor. Accordingly, there are no such things as “labor-values” and the transformation of value into competitive price does not contradict the determination of value by labor or Marx's “law of exchange”: it is the process through which labor-value becomes objectified as money price in such a way as to equalize the profit rate of capitals of a nonuniform composition. With the “transformation” of value into competitive price, Marx refutes Ricardo's refutation of the labor theory of value in principles (chap. 1, sec. 4).

Key concepts: Economics, Prices of production, Value (mathematics), Exchange value, Rate of profit, Labor theory of value, Presupposition, Value theory

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “Quantitative Approach” to the Marxian Concept of Value — Research Paper | ScholarLens