2006The Journal of World Intellectual PropertyRequires access

Anomalies in Copyright Law

Anirban Mazumder

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The word copyright is a misnomer. The law of copyright is based on the encouragement of motive. Plagiarism is not necessarily copyright infringement and copyright infringement is not necessarily plagiarism. Copyright law is concerned, in essence, with the negative right of preventing the copying of physical material. Copyright is not a monopoly, unlike patent and registered design. Thus, if it can be shown that two precisely similar works were in fact produced wholly independently of one another, there can be no infringement of copyright by one or the other. Substantial similarity leading to copyright infringement is a grey area in copyright law. As per copyright law principles, making a digital copy itself is copyright infringement, no matter what amount of work is accessible to users. If a compilation work satisfies the originality criteria, that is ‘creativity’, then it will be protected. There is no copyright in facts per se, but original expression of factual compilation can have copyright protection.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The word copyright is a misnomer. The law of copyright is based on the encouragement of motive. Plagiarism is not necessarily copyright infringement and copyright infringement is not necessarily plagiarism. Copyright law is concerned, in essence, with the negative right of preventing the copying of physical material. Copyright is not a monopoly, unlike patent and registered design. Thus, if it can be shown that two precisely similar works were in fact produced wholly independently of one another, there can be no infringement of copyright by one or the other. Substantial similarity leading to copyright infringement is a grey area in copyright law. As per copyright law principles, making a digital copy itself is copyright infringement, no matter what amount of work is accessible to users. If a compilation work satisfies the originality criteria, that is ‘creativity’, then it will be protected. There is no copyright in facts per se, but original expression of factual compilation can have copyright protection.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The word copyright is a misnomer. The law of copyright is based on the encouragement of motive. Plagiarism is not necessarily copyright infringement and copyright infringement is not necessarily plagiarism. Copyright law is concerned, in essence, with the negative right of preventing the copying of physical material. Copyright is not a monopoly, unlike patent and registered design. Thus, if it can be shown that two precisely similar works were in fact produced wholly independently of one another, there can be no infringement of copyright by one or the other. Substantial similarity leading to copyright infringement is a grey area in copyright law. As per copyright law principles, making a digital copy itself is copyright infringement, no matter what amount of work is accessible to users. If a compilation work satisfies the originality criteria, that is ‘creativity’, then it will be protected. There is no copyright in facts per se, but original expression of factual compilation can have copyright protection.

Key concepts: Copying, Copyright law, Copyright infringement, Public domain, Common law copyright, Misnomer, Intellectual property, Law and economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anomalies in Copyright Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens